Showing posts with label Wendy Davis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wendy Davis. Show all posts

Thursday, January 30, 2014

Wendy Davis Lied! Did not "Struggle" to the Top on her own. Ex Husband Paid her Nicely, then She Divorced Him

from the Washington Examiner:

"I came from a place of struggle," insisted Texas gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis after the Dallas Morning News revealed that key details of the life story she had successfully shopped to the mainstream media were false. She wasn't a 19-year-old mom when she was first divorced, but 21. She lived with her second husband in the very comfortable Mistletoe Heights neighborhood of Fort Worth, Texas, not in a trailer park made famous by a thousand admiring profiles. She lived in the trailer park for just a few months. One of Davis' struggles, apparently, is with the truth.
Davis isn't the first politician to campaign falsely as an up-from-poverty candidate. William Henry Harrison, scion of a wealthy family, campaigned in 1840 as the "log cabin and hard cider" candidate against Martin Van Buren. It worked, though Harrison didn't live to relish his success. The story about his two-hour inaugural address, which caused him to catch pneumonia, is probably untrue -- he didn't fall ill until three weeks later. It may have been the snakeweed or leeches that gave him the septicemia that killed him, or it may have been the office-seekers, who reportedly crowded the White House to the point he couldn't find a place to rest when he felt sick.
You might suppose that reflections on the Internet age -- and the impossibility of hiding the truth -- will now follow the tale of Harrison's successful deception. Not really. What's surprising about the Davis tale is that someone actually took the trouble to question her account, because her "narrative" appeals so strongly to the liberal imagination. We just love the "little woman who conquers the world" stories, especially if (well, OK, only if) she favors abortion throughout the nine months of pregnancy, a higher minimum wage and universal pre-K.
Davis did grow up in difficult circumstances — her parents divorced, and Davis went to work early. She also made poor decisions, moving in with a boyfriend at the age of 17. Her story of working hard to better herself, first at community college and then at Texas Christian University and Harvard Law School, is a tribute to her tenacity and intelligence.
But it requires a pretty calculating coldness to omit from her story husband No. 2, Jeff Davis, the lawyer she married when she was 24 and lived with for 18 years. It was he who paid her tuition at TCU and Harvard Law, cashing out his 401(k) and borrowing money to do it. It was he who cared for her two daughters when she went to Boston to study law for three years. And it was he who got custody (with no contest) after the divorce. He notes ruefully that she left the marriage at a key juncture: "It was ironic," he told the Dallas Morning News. "I made the last [Harvard] payment, and it was the next day she left."
No outsider can ever know what goes on in a marriage, and it isn't our place to speculate, but Davis herself made her single-mother-beats-the-odds personal story a key part of her campaign. Just before the Dallas Morning News story broke, Davis was the subject of a fawning profile on "Today." Maria Shriver introduced the story of the plucky gubernatorial aspirant over chyrons touting "doing it all" and "on her own two feet." Her personal story, we were told, "resonated across this country." Davis visited the trailer park with Shriver and spoke of having to scrape together enough money to keep the lights on, sometimes working two jobs. Her 18-year marriage to a man who committed himself to her welfare and went into debt to help her achieve her career goals was practically airbrushed out, mentioning in passing -- "she married again for a time" -- to explain the appearance of her second daughter. The rest is Harvard triumphalism and her star turnfilibustering an abortion law in the Texas Senate.
Davis achieved success the way most successful people do -- through hard work and the support of a loving family. She, and the press who lionize her, seem all too eager to suggest that she somehow did everything all by herself. This false heroic tale is a common trope on the Left these days -- women doing it all by themselves. It's more than partisan hackery. It reinforces the very damaging notion that women don't need husbands. Many, many women are swallowing this propaganda and acting on it. They, their children and our society are suffering mightily as a result.
MONA CHAREN, a Washington Examiner columnist, is nationally syndicated by Creators Syndicate.

read more here: http://washingtonexaminer.com/wendy-davis-didnt-struggle-to-the-top-on-her-own/article/2542795

Friday, October 4, 2013

Michael Q. Sullivan Responds to Wendy Davis Announcing to run for Texas Governor

Good afternoon! 

Wanted to make sure you saw the press statement we issued a few minutes ago. 

-mq

______________________
Michael Quinn Sullivan
EmpowerTexans.com
1836Campaign.com
Direct: 512-850-4336 

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Morgan Williamson (TFR press)" <press@empowertexans.com
Subject: Statement on Wendy Davis candidacy
Date: October 3, 2013 15:28:27 CDT
To:
Texans for Fiscal Responsibility (logo) Texans for Fiscal Responsibility
EmpowerTexans.com
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 3, 2013
CONTACT: Morgan Williamson
(512) 693-9553
mwilliamson@empowertexans.com
or press@empowertexans.com


AUSTIN, Texas – As State Sen. Wendy Davis enters the 2014 gubernatorial race, the president of Texans for Fiscal Responsibility – Michael Quinn Sullivan – offered the following statement.
“On issue after issue, Wendy Davis has styled herself as a politician eager to please a narrow band of entrenched, liberal special interests. Her policy positions would put the state on a spending spree the likes of which we have never seen. Sen. Davis has refused to sign the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, thereby putting the best economic interests of Texans behind bloated bureaucracies eager for more power and money.

“As an avid proponent of ObamaCare and Medicaid expansion, Wendy Davis has established herself as someone willing to turn the Lone Star State into Texafornia.

“Wendy Davis wants to turn Texas blue by way of a sea of red-ink and a flood of high taxes.

“Finally, Davis’ professional interests have clearly been designed over the years to profit from the positions of public trust she has held. Whether illegal, unethical or just wrong, Texans are not well-served by an officeholder who stretches past breaking the relationship between their public life and private income.”

 
(A website dedicated to the questions about Wendy Davis’ ethical choices, www.WendyDavis.org, provides additional information.)

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Abortion is Murder, not a Wedge – Why Are Republicans Attacking Pro-Life Republicans for Exposing Wendy and Sarah Davis?



This week, fellow blogger Bob Price wrote an article attacking me. Why was I attacked? I was attacked because I stood up for LIFE and I stood up for the Republican Party Platform on my Texas GOP Vote – David Bellow blog. As thousands of Texans rallied in Austin this week to stand up for life, Rep. Sarah Davis was fighting against them. Price wrote an article criticizing me because I dared to expose that Sarah Davis is fighting for abortion and because I also pointed out that the Republican Party of Texas Platform calls on the Party to not give funds to candidates, like Sarah Davis, who are not pro-life. 

Abortion is not an insignificant wedge issue. Abortion is the murder of millions of innocent babies, and if Republicans do not defend our most important values and principles then we will lose our Party and lose elections. Pro Life Conservative Ted Cruz got more votes and won by a bigger percentage than Sarah Davis in her own district so it is false to say we have to support pro-abortion moderates like Sarah Davis in order to win in her “swing district”

Bob Price even went as far as to say that he knows I am a Christian, but me opposing Sarah Davis and saying she is for abortion is acting un-Christian! So let me get this straight, voting to allow late term murders of innocent little babies is ok, but if I write an article saying that someone voting to allow late term abortions is wrong then I am the un-Christian bad guy? Price went on to defend Sarah Davis by saying she is not necessarily pro-abortion just because she is pro-choice (a ridiculous feel good line right out of the Planned Parenthood deception playbook).

I know Bob Price and he is a conservative and we agree on most issues. I will not hold a grudge and will of course move past this and work with him, but for now I have to defend myself against his attack

Below, I will respond to every allegation that Bob Price levied against me and I will prove that Sarah Davis is a pro-abortion RINO who is worthy of opposition.
                                                             
1)      Bob Price questioned in his headline why I was attacking Republican Pro-Abortion Sarah Davis and not attacking Democrat Pro Abortion Wendy Davis.

FALSE: If Bob were to visit my website or look at my Facebook or my Twitter pages he would clearly see that I have made DOZENS of posts and comments in the last 2 weeks attacking pro-abortion Democrat Wendy Davis and the unruly Democrat mob. Over 99 percent of the over 1000 articles on my website are against Democrats, Liberals and Obama. Here are some examples of the many articles I have posted on my website against Wendy Davis here & here & here & here & here & here. In fact, my most recent article on Texas GOP Vote is an article praising the Texas GOP as being the best party while exposing the Democrats for their bad actions and bad values displayed over the past few weeks.

Yes, every once in a while there is a need to speak up and defend Republican values against even a Republican. Just because someone claims to be a Republican does not mean they are automatically off limits and can do what they want without being held accountable for their actions. Sarah Davis is the only Republican fighting against these late term abortion restrictions and I will not apologize for standing for life and standing for our Platform.

2)      Bob Price Claims that I am wrong for saying that people who are pro-choice are not pro-abortion.

False: Being pro-choice is the same thing as being pro-abortion. Pro-Choice and Pro-Reproductive Rights are nice terms that Planned Parenthood uses to make it not sound bad when they advocate for allowing the genocide of millions of innocent unborn babies. I never said Sarah Davis has killed any babies, but yes, by voting AGAINST a ban on late term abortions, Sarah Davis has voted in favor of allowing innocent late term babies to be torn apart and killed. Sarah can say she is pro-choice but it is just deception. Does the baby who gets killed have a CHOICE? NO! And what does Sarah even mean when she says is pro-choice? Being pro-choice means she is for allowing people to choose to kill innocent unborn babies. Voting to allow someone to have a choice to kill their baby is voting in favor of allowing babies to be killed, and that is what Sarah Davis has done. Use whatever fancy words you want but pro-choice is pro-abortion. Think of how ridiculous it would sound if I applied Bob’s logic to other issues. Nazis were not pro killing the Jews, they were just for Hitler having the right to choose which race is better in order to create a perfect race. The KKK was not for slavery, they just believed that people have a right to choose to enslave, beat and kill other humans.

To be fair, Bob Price did talk to Sarah Davis and she told Bob that she was not against the Texas 20 week abortion ban if it included to protect the health of the mother. While I appreciate Bob asking Davis the question and Davis responding, I cannot at all consider her statement to be pro-life. The Texas bill already had an exemption for the life of the mother, the health of the mother is something that right out of the Planned Parenthood playbook that sounds good but goes beyond protecting the mother’s life and would allow virtually any abortions after 20 weeks even if there is a ban because health of the woman is so general it could give any woman an exemption.

3)      The truth is, Sarah Davis is not only pro-abortion, but she is a well under 80 percent Republican RINO. She got failing grades from all conservative organization rankings.

Bob Price says that Sarah Davis stands for over 80 percent of Republican values and therefore I should ignore that she is pro-choice and not criticize her for standing against life. Price is WRONG about standing for the person over the values and he is wrong that Davis is over 80% Republican. First of all, Price claims that Sarah Davis is a good Republican other than being against life. He pulled that stat out of thin air because the truth is that all the major conservative organizations gave her failing grades after last session. Texas Eagle Forum gave her 36% for mostly social issues, Texans for Fiscal Responsibility gave her a C+ (below 80%) for fiscal issues, and Young Conservatives of Texas gave her 61% for overall conservative rating. Her pro-abortion beliefs are even clearer. She got a 100% rating from Planned Parenthood. Sorry, but you do not get 100% from Planned Parenthood unless you are absolutely 100 percent pro-abortion and in favor of everything Planned Parenthood does and wants to do.

4)      I agree that not everyone agrees 100% on everything and we should still work together, but if we do not Stand for our Republican Values then we will LOSE our Party and LOSE elections.

The Republican Party is not just about getting anyone elected who will put an R behind their name. If that were the case would you support Obama if one day he just decided to put an R behind his name instead of a D? You see, the Republican Party is not just about numbers or just about winning elections, the Republican Party is about a SET OF VALUES and the goal of the Party is to promote that set of values and get people elected who BELIEVE IN OUR REPUBLICAN VALUES. I too like Ronald Reagan’s 80% rule that says if someone believes in 80% or more of Republican values then they are your ally. I agree, and I work with and support candidates all the time that I do not 100% agree with. That being said, having an over 80% ally does not mean you just sit back and give a pass to someone who is for abortion just because they are a fellow Republican. You can still call them out on that issue and work with them on other issues. It is even ok to try to elect a better Republican to replace them, especially is they are a RINO like Sarah Davis.

NOT following the platform and not standing for our values is what is driving people away from the Republican Party.  Abortion is an important issue and is a pillar of our Party foundation. It is not just a wedge issue. The more the party tries to compromise our values the more the base will run away from the Party. Romney lost because the conservative base of the party did not show up to vote. They were not excited about a wishy washy, seemingly moderate Romney. You may think widening the tent by compromising on important values will help Republicans win but it will make us lose because for every moderate we add there is more than one conservative who we lose because they lose faith in the Party.

Sarah Davis does not have to be pro-abortion to win her district. Pro Life Ted Cruz won in her district with a better percentage than her!

Ted Cruz got elected in her district with a higher percentage than what she got. Cruz ran on pro-life platforms and they did BETTER than pro-abortion Sarah Davis in her own district! In the 2012 election Cruz got 55.4%. Davis underperformed them with 54.6%.


5)      Bob Price says the Republican Party of Texas did not violate the Party Platform by giving money to Pro-Abortion Candidate Sarah Davis.

FALSE: Last time I checked, the thousands of delegates at the Republican State Convention specifically put in the Party Platform a section that implores the Party to NOT give ANY Party funds to candidates who are not pro-life. Anyone with common sense would say that it is a clear violation of the platform, and against the will of the delegates, for the Party to give money to a candidate who is not pro-life. Price admits that the platform does call on the Party to withhold funds from non pro-life candidates, but he says that really it is up to the discretion of the Party. Really? Since when does the Party get to pick and choose which parts of the platform to follow? Candidates can pick and choose what they want I suppose but the PARTY officials are put in place by the delegates to UPHOLD the Party Platform and rules.

The platform does go on to call on the Party officials to make the platform pro-abortion money restriction an official rule. The Party has not done so. I never said the Party violated a rule. I only said they Party violated the platform, which they did when they gave money to a pro-abortion candidate even though the Platform calls on them not to do so and to make it an official rule not to do so.

6)      I NEVER said the Texas GOP should oppose Sarah Davis or support her Democrat opponent. I only said that the Party money should have gone to many other more important races to support more conservative, pro-life Republicans. Her race was not even that important in the big picture compared to other races.

I never said someone could not give their personal money to her race. I never said she Sarah Davis does not have the right to run and does not have the right to believe how she wants to believe. I only said that Party should follow the platform and not give Party money to pro-abortion candidates.

The fact is though, with so many races, the Party cannot and does not get involved in more than 90% or all races in Texas. With limited funds and resources, the Party should focus on getting involved in races where the Republican candidates uphold Republican values and where the Republican winning is of most importance. There were there many other races where the more conservative, pro-life Republican Candidates did not get help from the Party but could have used it. There was NEVER a threat of Republicans losing the strong majority in the Texas House. There is a big threat of conservative Republicans losing the hold on the State Board of Education. Hispanic Charlie Garza is a Republican State Board of Education member who lost his seat to a Democrat. Garza needed the money in his race more than Davis.

Furthermore, Bob Price did not mention in his article that I wanted to write an article about Davis last year, but he asked me to hold off because it might help her Democrat opponent in the General Election. Although I do not like Sarah Davis because of her beliefs, I did not want her Democrat opponent to win so I decided to hold off until after she won against her Democrat opponent and then I would expose her pro-abortion beliefs before the next primary so that hopefully another Republican will beat her.

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

One Step Closer: Texas House Passes New Abortion Limits

the following article is from The Blaze: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/07/10/one-step-closer-texas-house-passes-new-abortion-limits/


AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — The Texas House approved new abortion limits Wednesday in a second special session, less than two weeks after Senate Republicans failed to finish work on the bill amid a filibuster and raucous protests.
Texas House of Representatives Passes New Abortion Limits
Opponents of HB 2, an abortion bill, yell outside the Texas House after the bill is provisionally approved, Tuesday, July 9, 2013, in Austin, Texas. The bill passed a final, formal vote Wednesday. It requires doctors to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals, only allow abortions in surgical centers, dictate when abortion pills are taken and ban abortions after 20 weeks. (AP)
A final vote could be held as early as Friday in the Senate, where the measure died as the first special session expired. The House voted mostly along party lines on what has become signature GOP legislation.
Lawmakers spent more than 10 hours debating it Tuesday, and Republicans rejected every attempt to amend the bill. Throngs of protesters were missing for Wednesday’s mostly procedural vote after days of protests by supporters and opponents.
The bill requires doctors to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals, only allow abortions in surgical centers and ban abortions after 20 weeks.
The House gallery was largely empty Wednesday morning, with a smattering of the orange and blue T-shirts worn by opponents and supporters of the bill. This was in stark contrast to Tuesday night’s vote, when hundreds filled the Capitol rotunda chanting, “Shame on you!”
Planned Parenthood took their Stand With Texas Women campaign on the road Tuesday, rallying more than 1,100 supporters in downtown Houston to oppose the measure. The bus tour was expected in Dallas on Wednesday, with a speech by Fort Worth Sen. Wendy Davis, a rising Democratic star following her filibuster against the bill last month.
Texas House of Representatives Passes New Abortion Limits
Rep. Jason Villalba, R-Dallas, holds a sonogram showing his unborn son during final remarks before a final vote on HB 2, an abortion bill,Tuesday, July 9, 2013, in Austin, Texas. (AP)
No other issue in Texas has rallied Democratic voters, young activists and women’s right supporters in recent years like House Bill 2. The Texas Democratic Party has helped organize rallies opposing the bill and have used them to register new voters.
Gov. Rick Perry has made it a personal goal to end abortions in Texas, and voting for anti-abortion measures is a litmus test for Republican politicians. Conservative Christian groups keep scorecards on lawmaker’s voting records.
There is little Democrats can do to stop the measure in the Republican-controlled Legislature. But they have worked hard to enter into the legislative record testimony that opponents can use to convince a federal court to overturn the law before it can take effect.
They also say the Texas restrictions and those passed by other states conflict with the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which established that a woman has the right to get an abortion until her fetus could viably survive outside of the womb, which is generally at 22 to 24 weeks of the pregnancy.
Texas House of Representatives Passes New Abortion Limits
A woman carries a sign as she marches with other pro-abortion rights supporters through downtown Austin, Texas on Monday evening, July 8, 2013. The Texas House began debating a bill on Tuesday that would impose tough new restrictions on abortions. (AP)
Texas House of Representatives Passes New Abortion Limits
Supports of an abortion bill cheer during an anti-abortion rally at the Texas Capitol, Monday, July 8, 2013, in Austin, Texas. The fight over access to abortion in Texas resumed Monday with thousands expected to attend a marathon Senate hearing and a nighttime anti-abortion rally at the Capitol. (AP)
It’s unclear if the Texas restrictions could survive a court challenge. Federal courts have suspended aspects of the bill enacted by other states. On Monday, a federal judge blocked enforcement of a Wisconsin abortion law requiring admitting privileges.
The Texas Medical Association, the Texas Hospital Association and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology oppose the bill, calling it unnecessary.
Democratic Rep. Ruth McClendon, of San Antonio, made one last attempt to amend the bill Wednesday to add funding for the Adoption Assistance Program, which provides financial assistance to families that adopt children in the foster care system. Other Democrats said that if the bill passes, then the number of unintended pregnancies would increase and place greater demand on the foster system.
“If we don’t adopt this amendment, then we are saying that we don’t care about the children of Texas,” she said.
But the bill’s author Rep. Jody Laubenberg, R-Parker, said she opposed all amendments to her bill. She said the Legislature had appropriated enough money for foster children.

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Texas GOP = GOOD; Democrats = "Hail Satan, I Hope You're Raped, Kill Babies"

The last couple of weeks in Texas have really exposed Democrats for who they really are, an unruly mob who, when they do not get their way, decide to disrupt the legislature; they oppose the strong majority of Americans by wanting to allow late term abortions; they send their children out to protest with vulgar signs; they call for women pro-life legislators and even call for their daughters to be raped, and they even chant "Hail Satan" as pro-life Republicans sing Amazing Grace. Congratulations, the Democrat Party has become Occupy Wall Street 2.0. I hope all you conservative Democrats are watching and realize that the Democrat Party is not for you. They do not share your values. The Democrat Party that you once knew has left you and has embraced radical liberal ideology.

The Republican Party is the Party for you. We are the Party that your values align with. The Republican Party Platform is a set of values that we can believe in because these values have made America great! Sure, sometimes I do articles that criticize the Texas GOP for not abiding by our good platform, but that is not because I do not like the Texas GOP, it is because I DO like the Party and believe in the Party Platform values and I know that the best way to keep the Party strong is to help keep it from straying from our values.

Here is the Shocking Truth of What the pro-abortion Democrats and their Mobs have done Over the Past Couple of Weeks:

While Republicans in Texas seek to ban late term abortions after 20 weeks because the little babies can feel pain when they have their little arms and legs ripped off, the Texas Democrats, with leader Wendy Davis, are doing everything they can to allow late term abortions to continue. Democrat Wendy Davis made national headlines when she delayed these pro abortion restrictions by filibustering the bill at the end of the 2013 Texas Special Session. The media tried to run with the story and make her out to be a heroine and make Texas look bad for trying to restrict late term abortions. This plan by the Democrats and the media backfired because, well, the fact is that the large majority of Americans are AGAINST late term abortions, Several states already ban abortions after 20 weeks and most countries also have abortion bans after even just 10 weeks. Why? Because even Democrats in America do not believe that people should be able to have abortions after the first trimester when the baby is already very developed and can feel pain and has a heartbeat and little hands and little feet. So this plan by Wendy Davis and the Media backfired. The people of Texas and even America do not stand with Wendy and they do not agree with the Democrats. The majority of Texans #Stand4Life. Wendy Davis had to get help from Obama to get tweets flowing from mostly other states to support her. Texas Senator Ted Cruz took a stand and pointed out that Wendy Davis does not speak for Texas. Conservative Konni Burton has stepped up to the plate to run against Davis in what will be a hotly contested race.

Knowing they were losing, the media and the Democrats tried to distract people by crying out sexism. Hey everyone, look, the Republican men are against women and us Women Democrats are standing up for women. The people did not buy into that distraction either. Why? Because the biggest proponents of this pro-life bill, and even the main authors of the bill, are WOMEN REPUBLICANS. these Women put forth the bill as a way to protect what is best for both WOMEN and unborn WOMEN both mentally and physically. Kermit Gosnell style abortion clinics are dangerous, unregulated, and unhealthy for women. Late Term Abortions are damaging to women who live with the regret of ripping apart a little baby who could feel pain, not to mention late term abortions are horrible for the baby who has to feel the pain and never gets a chance to live. And yes, although Wendy Davis and RINO Joe Straus did not like it, Governor Rick Perry was right, you got a chance to live and overcome the odds Wendy Davis, so why not let another little baby have a chance? Speaking of trying to play the sexism card, one Texas Democrat legislator, Leticia Van De Putte, even made the outrageous statement on the Senate floor "what does a woman legislator have to do to be heard over the men in the room" This was outrageous because it assumes again that only men are for pro life issues when many women legislators are for the pro life bills; it was outrageous because the reason she was not heard was because of HER PARTY's mob in the room making noise; and to top it all off her statement was outrageous because it was her Party and her friend Wendy Davis who denied WOMEN Republican legislators the ability to speak on the Senate floor when the women wanted to give an opinion on the issue during her filibuster. Thankfully, many of these GOP women legislators, like Dr. Donna Campbell, got on the national news and, as a women, let America can know that Wendy Davis does NOT represent the majority of women and pro life bills are not sexist and not just pushed by men but also by women.

The Democrat Party became an UNRULY MOB when they knew that they were not going to get their way. This mob did not like what the elected officials at the State Capitol in Austin, TX were voting on so they swarmed the Capitol and purposely disrupted the Legislature to keep them from being able to vote. They knew that that they could not win the majority of the hearts and minds of Texas voters who want to end late term abortions, so they decided to use Occupy Wall Street tactics to stop the vote. The chaos that ensued over the next several days included this unruly Democrat mob calling for women pro-life Legislators to be raped. Where was the mainstream media to protect these women Republicans who were being threatened with rape? Oh yeah, they are Republicans so who cares about protecting those women right? They paraded their children through the streets with vulgar, profanity filled signs that had written on it things like "If I wanted government in my V****a I would f**k a senator." Really? you have your kid hold that sign? The worst part of the kids holding signs is that these kids are holding signs that advocate for their parents being able to kill them, the kids.

And last but not least, when the unruly mob opposed a pro life woman speaking at the State Capitol and when they opposed the pro life people singing "Amazing Grace," the Democrat pro-abortion mob started chanting "Hail Satan." The video of this Democrat mob chanting "Hail Satan" made national media headlines because it was just so outrageous that it would be hard to believe without video. The official Church of Satan even came out and made a statement denouncing the Democrat mob chanting "Hail Satan." That is right, even the Satan worshipers think the Democrat pro-abortion mobs are too extreme for them.

So let me ask you again, do the Liberal Democrat actions and values represent who you are and what you believe? My guess is the answer is NO for most Americans. Take a look at the Republican Party. Our values and actions likely DO represent you better. We are for helping you find a job and support a family by helping create jobs and keeping taxes low. We are for supporting all humans whether black or white or old or unborn. We are for protecting America the enemies who want to attack and kill us because they hate our freedom.

Join us MONDAY July 8th, 2013 at 7p.m. for a PRO-LIFE RALLY at the Texas Capitol Building in Austin, TX. the lineup of speakers will be great from national pro life groups and advocates like former Governor Mick Huckabee to local State Leaders like Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott.

image from Texas GOP email
a life, not a choice

TX Woman GOP Senator Donna Campbell blasts pro abortion Dems for standing against Women's Health and for Killing Babies

Donna Campbell says pro-abortion Wendy Davis does not represent the majority of Texans and not the majority of women.

the following is from No More Cocktails: http://nomorecocktails.com/post/2013/07/06/AWESOME-TX-Senator-Dr-Donna-Campbell-blasts-abortion-rights-crowd-Care-more-about-predatory-abortion-industry.aspx

[AWESOME] TX Senator Dr. Donna Campbell blasts abortion rights crowd - 'Care more about predatory abortion industry'

Posted on 7/6/2013 10:45 PM in Politics

Dr. Donna Campbell a Texas State Senator spoke to Megyn Kelly about the anti-abortion bill moving through the Texas Legislature. Wendy Davis managed to temporarily stop it. Donna Campbell a physician spoke abut the bill at a pro-life rally in Texas and then spoke to Megyn Kelly. She blasted the abortion rights crowd who want government dollars for their abortions but yet do not want the government interfering at all in their abortions.




Tea-Party Activist Konni Burton Challenges Wendy Davis for Texas Senate Seat

the following article is from the National Review Online: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/352534/tea-party-activist-burton-challenges-davis-texas-senate-seat-betsy-woodruff

 

Long before Wendy Davis became a national target for the pro-life movement, Konni Burton wanted to take her down. Burton, a long-time Texas tea-party activist, decided months ago to challenge Davis for her Senate seat. It will be Burton’s first political campaign. And it might be competitive.
“It’s a marginal district, there’s no question,” says Matt Mackowiak, a Texas Republican consultant. “She won it this last cycle because the candidate we had ran a terrible, terrible race. Talk to any Republican consultant in the state, they’ll tell you that was one of the worst campaigns ran the entire cycle.”
That candidate, Mark Shelton, is running for the Republican nomination again this time. But Burton has also thrown her hat in the ring.
“I think Tarrant County is far more conservative than she’s been representing us,” says State Representative Jonathan Stickland of Davis. “And I was involved in the Mark Shelton campaign against Wendy last time and I thought it was a dismal failure, and I think that we needed a strong conservative to motivate the base to get out and vote, I don’t think that a moderate could do that, and Konni Burton is the clear conservative choice, in my opinion.”
Davis will be formidable and flush with cash. But, according to Mackowiak, many who are hopeful about Davis’s future overlook just how pro-life Texas is. So while becoming the darling of the pro-choice movement certainly has its electoral advantages, it might backfire. Because of redistricting, state senators had to draw straws to determine the lengths of their terms. Davis drew a straw giving her a two-year term.
“Once she did that, all of us that were disappointed in how the last election went kind of, you know, did a big hoorah,” Burton says. “What I thought when I looked at it was like: We get a do-over. Instead of her having a four-year term, she got a two-year term. So that was excellent.”
Despite that, Burton had trouble recruiting someone to run for the seat. So she decided to just run herself.
“She’ll be a firebrand and create a lot of excitement,” Mackowiak says.
Elizabeth Graham of Texas Right to Life isn’t as optimistic about Burton’s prospects — she says the chance of the activist taking Davis’s seat is “doubtful.”
“There will probably be a number of candidates looking at that seat,” Graham says, adding that her group will endorse the candidate they feel best represents the pro-life movement.
Burton has racked up a number of other endorsements, including from business leaders, Stickland, and JoAnn Fleming, chair of the Advisory Committee to the TEA Party Caucus of the Texas Legislature. She’s also hired a consultant, Luke Macias. And thanks to Davis’s filibuster, fundraising has picked up.
“I was doing well with fundraising previous to this, but this has certainly helped, this pro-abortion stand that Wendy has taken,” Burton tells me. “It’s a stand for abortions after five months! It’s helped immensely.”

read the rest of the article here: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/352534/tea-party-activist-burton-challenges-davis-texas-senate-seat-betsy-woodruff

Polls Show Public STRONGLY Favors Abortion Bans, Oppose Wendy Davis - Media Silent

the media went goo goo ga ga over Democrat Wendy Davis stalling a Texas bill that will ban abortions after 20 weeks. the acted like Texas is crazy and the people of America are against abortion restriction. WRONG! The truth is that the majority of Americans STRONGLY favor restrictions on abortions after the first trimester. Most other countries already ban abortions after even just 10 weeks.

WHERE IS THE MEDIA? WHY ARE THEY NOT REPORTING THAT PEOPLE WANT TO BAN KILLING BABIES AFTER THEY BEGIN TO DEVELOP?


the following article is from Real Clear Politics: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/06/30/the_public_doesnt_support_wendy_davis_position.html


The Public Doesn't Support Wendy Davis' Position

By Ben Domenech - June 30, 2013

Oh, my mistake. It’s actually around half of Americans who favor gay marriage. Those figures above are for the percentage of Americans who support banning abortion after the first trimester (13 weeks), and after the second trimester (28 weeks), respectively.
 
But that can’t be possible. Because if that was the case, wouldn’t we have heard about it, from the newspapers? Maybe they just haven’t gotten around to reporting it – a blind spot missed amidst all the other pressing news. Except – it looks like Americans have thought this for almost two decades. The percent supporting a second trimester ban has never dropped below 64 percent, and the percent supporting a third trimester ban has never dropped below 80 percent in that time. These positions are true elsewhere, too – once a baby starts looking like a baby, people tend to think it ought to be protected. That’s why most of Europe has bans on abortion ranging from 10 to 22 weeks, and the major countries have first trimester bans – Portugal at 10 weeks, Germany and Spain at 14 weeks, Italy at effectively the end of the first trimester. France is at 14 weeks as well, and they even mandate a one-week waiting period for all abortions. Most of these countries also have conscientious objection clauses designed to protect those doctors with moral objections to abortion.
On such a divisive issue, you’d think the fact that this broadly popular position has endured in America and around the world to such a degree would inform the political analysis of the media. But last night we saw how personally invested many in the media are in the limitless, on-demand abortion regime in their obvious cheerleading for Texas State Senator Wendy Davis, who was filibustering a Texas measure that would limit abortion to the 20 week mark and require a host of regulatory steps which would shut down most Texas abortion clinics. Most egregious of all was the point in the evening when reporters were actually urging protesters on, encouraging them to scream and shout to delay a floor vote on the measure. This went well beyond the bounds of journalism – and indeed was indistinguishable from the single-issue abortion activists. 
It was indistinguishable because the press is, by and large, unanimous on the issue. We saw this in the disinterested approach to reporting on the Kermit Gosnell trial (until pressured into it by Mollie Hemingway and Kristen Powers). Those who write about abortion as a political issue are only interested in reporting about abortion politics when they view it as an opportunity to press its agenda. You will see a great deal of reporting in the coming weeks about Davis’s rising political star – she’s ambitious, with statewide hopes – because the reporters view her as the activists do: a heroic, courageous figure, assaulted by the GOP’s war on women. But you’ll likely see little reporting about the fact that 62 percent of Texans support the 20 week ban she was filibustering. The agenda takes precedence. They know that fighting this bill now is better than fighting it before the Supreme Court.
Twenty weeks is, of course, an arbitrary mark to draw a line between protected under law and lump of cells. The general argument from the pro-lifers is that it is a point where the unborn obviously feel pain. Viability is a threshold that continues to move earlier thanks to medical science, and indeed some children born at 20 weeks have survived. But there’s something else that happens at around the 20 week mark: the unborn can distinguish sounds. The first sound they will hear is the voice of their mother. In the weeks to come it will be a soothing and recognizable sound, distinguishable from all the rest. They will respond to it and react to it, to changes in volume and conversation. Much later, they will even be able to recognize tones of voice. But at the twenty week mark, there is only the formless sound. The child cannot understand what she is saying. They cannot detect the difference in tenor when she makes the call, and schedules the appointment, and takes them from the waiting room into the operating room where they will die. They only recognize it as a mother’s voice, full of promise, enveloping them – familiar, reassuring, safe. 
Benjamin Domenech is editor of The Transom. Click here to subscribe.


Read more: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/06/30/the_public_doesnt_support_wendy_davis_position.html#ixzz2YL7flnR6
Follow us: @RCP_Articles on Twitter