Officer and Judge Candidate Marcelo Molfino still lying to voters about his Resignation in Lieu of Termination

Marcelo Molfino is running for Judge again and he is still lying to the voters about him being recommended for termination by the Jefferson County District Attorney leadership, and resigned in lieu of termination. Mo Molfino, you do know you checked off the box that you resigned in lieu of termination when you applied to the Sour Lake Police Department? So why are you still lying to voters stating you simply resigned for no reason and that you were never in trouble or forced to resign in lieu of termination from the Jefferson County District attorney office? Why don’t you tell the good people of Hamshire Fannett and China Nome TX the truth? I really can’t believe you are running for Mo Molfino for Justice of the Peace again and still lying through your teeth. Everybody makes mistakes and people can move on and be better people, but you are never willing to admit ever doing anything wrong even when presented with the undeniable facts is what makes you one of the most dangerous people I have ever exposed for corruption and using the power of your badge for monetary profit and to go after your enemies. How can you tell the voters you simply resigned for no reason from da office when in fact, you know the DAs office leadership signed termination memo against you for basically lying and stealing, and then you even checked off on your application to sour Lake that you resigned in lieu of termination. But then you wanna try to tell the voters something opposite? Look, there’s a lot of lies and omissions In your government document application to the sour Lake Police Department, but you actually did check off that box that you were previously being terminated and resigned instead, so how can you tell the good voters otherwise?

Judge Candidate Marcelo Molfino Opposed Mandatory Reporting of a Child Molestation Outcry

Voters need to know about Marcelo Molfino opposing mandatory reporting of a child’s out cry of sexual molestation. This guy is running for JP4 and he works in kids organizations and he bashed someone who had a legal duty to report a specific graphic outcry from a toddler? Maybe I should start calling him “Mo the Child Molester Protector Molfino”, because that’s what he’s advocating for, NOT reporting outcries from children about potential child molestation (which could only protect a potential child molester). Of all the corruption and lies I’ve exposed about him, this is something that makes me the most upset. This man should not be in elected office as Jefferson County Judge Justice of the Peace, nor should he taint the Sour Lake Police Department and he certainly shouldn’t be anywhere around children. Apparently he works on some Hamshire Fannett Education Foundation and with the Ehrhart Girls School and CASA of Southeast Texas in Beaumont, TX. Would he criticize a teacher at those schools if a girl told the teacher about a sexual assault and the teacher reported it? Regardless of whether or not the allegation is found to be true, it should always be reported and then law-enforcement can do their job and determine what happened. How could anyone advocate for or criticize someone (like Mo Molfino did) who simply did their duty of reporting an outcry of sexual assault made by a child? This man is a snake and he will lie to you straight to your face with a smile. Apparently he’s still telling everybody that he was never forced to resign in lieu of termination, even though on his recent police department application he checked the box that said he previously resigned in lieu of termination. Look, everybody makes mistakes nobody’s perfect you learn from your mistakes and you move on and be a better person, but this man is someone more dangerous than most people I’ve ever exposed for corruption because he never believes or admits that he’s ever done anything wrong and most of his corruption involves using his badge or his position to harm other people typically in exchange for money. I’m sure y’all wanna know where he stated this about it being wrong for this person to have reported an outcry from a child, and it’s actually on paper in lawsuit that I won against him and he had to pay me after I exposed him for being a liar and a fraud he actually put it on paper in the lawsuit that it was wrong for this person to have reported a legitimate concern of an outcry from a toddler. The video attached gives more detail of the situation.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1578225940154433