Showing posts with label Texas Abortion Ban. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Texas Abortion Ban. Show all posts

Friday, November 1, 2013

Beaumont, TX Abortion Clinic Slammed with 13 Health and Safety Violations

As a Federal Court was granting an injunction to block tighter safety and health restrictions for abortion clinics in Texas, one Abortion clinic was getting hit with over a dozen health and safety violations discovered by the Texas Department of Health. The injunction was reversed on appeal and the tighter abortion safety laws are now in effect. How ironic that, as the Federal courts discussed the need to tighten health and safety restriction for abortion clinics, a Beaumont, TX Whole Woman's Health abortion clinic was proving that there DO need to be tighter restrictions. We of course already knew there needed to be tighter restrictions after last year's stories of death doctors all across America who were killing babies after they were born and putting the lives of women at risk.



from 12 News Beaumont:

BEAUMONT -

12News has learned that Beaumont's only abortion and women's health clinic has been flagged on 13 violations by the Texas Department of Health.

The October 3 inspection at Whole Woman's Health of Beaumont turned up potential health issues.
The report says the facility failed to provide a safe environment for patients and staff.  The suction machines which were used on patients had numerous rusty spots which, "had the likelihood to cause infection."
The report also says, "the facility failed to have the EKG monitoring equipment ready if an emergency situation occurred..."

Fatima Gifford, the spokeswoman for Whole Woman's Health, said Tuesday that at this time, the clinic did not have a comment, but said the staff is looking into the allegations in order to prepare a response to the Texas Department of Health. She says the clinic's goal is to provide safe, compassionate abortion care, and they take these matters seriously.

She went on to say that management does not believe this is anything suspicious or political on the part of the Texas Department of Health Services.  Her response was in light of Monday's judge's ruling which granted an injunction on a law that would have made abortions more restrictive in Texas
Click here to see a copy of the report

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Abortion is Murder, not a Wedge – Why Are Republicans Attacking Pro-Life Republicans for Exposing Wendy and Sarah Davis?



This week, fellow blogger Bob Price wrote an article attacking me. Why was I attacked? I was attacked because I stood up for LIFE and I stood up for the Republican Party Platform on my Texas GOP Vote – David Bellow blog. As thousands of Texans rallied in Austin this week to stand up for life, Rep. Sarah Davis was fighting against them. Price wrote an article criticizing me because I dared to expose that Sarah Davis is fighting for abortion and because I also pointed out that the Republican Party of Texas Platform calls on the Party to not give funds to candidates, like Sarah Davis, who are not pro-life. 

Abortion is not an insignificant wedge issue. Abortion is the murder of millions of innocent babies, and if Republicans do not defend our most important values and principles then we will lose our Party and lose elections. Pro Life Conservative Ted Cruz got more votes and won by a bigger percentage than Sarah Davis in her own district so it is false to say we have to support pro-abortion moderates like Sarah Davis in order to win in her “swing district”

Bob Price even went as far as to say that he knows I am a Christian, but me opposing Sarah Davis and saying she is for abortion is acting un-Christian! So let me get this straight, voting to allow late term murders of innocent little babies is ok, but if I write an article saying that someone voting to allow late term abortions is wrong then I am the un-Christian bad guy? Price went on to defend Sarah Davis by saying she is not necessarily pro-abortion just because she is pro-choice (a ridiculous feel good line right out of the Planned Parenthood deception playbook).

I know Bob Price and he is a conservative and we agree on most issues. I will not hold a grudge and will of course move past this and work with him, but for now I have to defend myself against his attack

Below, I will respond to every allegation that Bob Price levied against me and I will prove that Sarah Davis is a pro-abortion RINO who is worthy of opposition.
                                                             
1)      Bob Price questioned in his headline why I was attacking Republican Pro-Abortion Sarah Davis and not attacking Democrat Pro Abortion Wendy Davis.

FALSE: If Bob were to visit my website or look at my Facebook or my Twitter pages he would clearly see that I have made DOZENS of posts and comments in the last 2 weeks attacking pro-abortion Democrat Wendy Davis and the unruly Democrat mob. Over 99 percent of the over 1000 articles on my website are against Democrats, Liberals and Obama. Here are some examples of the many articles I have posted on my website against Wendy Davis here & here & here & here & here & here. In fact, my most recent article on Texas GOP Vote is an article praising the Texas GOP as being the best party while exposing the Democrats for their bad actions and bad values displayed over the past few weeks.

Yes, every once in a while there is a need to speak up and defend Republican values against even a Republican. Just because someone claims to be a Republican does not mean they are automatically off limits and can do what they want without being held accountable for their actions. Sarah Davis is the only Republican fighting against these late term abortion restrictions and I will not apologize for standing for life and standing for our Platform.

2)      Bob Price Claims that I am wrong for saying that people who are pro-choice are not pro-abortion.

False: Being pro-choice is the same thing as being pro-abortion. Pro-Choice and Pro-Reproductive Rights are nice terms that Planned Parenthood uses to make it not sound bad when they advocate for allowing the genocide of millions of innocent unborn babies. I never said Sarah Davis has killed any babies, but yes, by voting AGAINST a ban on late term abortions, Sarah Davis has voted in favor of allowing innocent late term babies to be torn apart and killed. Sarah can say she is pro-choice but it is just deception. Does the baby who gets killed have a CHOICE? NO! And what does Sarah even mean when she says is pro-choice? Being pro-choice means she is for allowing people to choose to kill innocent unborn babies. Voting to allow someone to have a choice to kill their baby is voting in favor of allowing babies to be killed, and that is what Sarah Davis has done. Use whatever fancy words you want but pro-choice is pro-abortion. Think of how ridiculous it would sound if I applied Bob’s logic to other issues. Nazis were not pro killing the Jews, they were just for Hitler having the right to choose which race is better in order to create a perfect race. The KKK was not for slavery, they just believed that people have a right to choose to enslave, beat and kill other humans.

To be fair, Bob Price did talk to Sarah Davis and she told Bob that she was not against the Texas 20 week abortion ban if it included to protect the health of the mother. While I appreciate Bob asking Davis the question and Davis responding, I cannot at all consider her statement to be pro-life. The Texas bill already had an exemption for the life of the mother, the health of the mother is something that right out of the Planned Parenthood playbook that sounds good but goes beyond protecting the mother’s life and would allow virtually any abortions after 20 weeks even if there is a ban because health of the woman is so general it could give any woman an exemption.

3)      The truth is, Sarah Davis is not only pro-abortion, but she is a well under 80 percent Republican RINO. She got failing grades from all conservative organization rankings.

Bob Price says that Sarah Davis stands for over 80 percent of Republican values and therefore I should ignore that she is pro-choice and not criticize her for standing against life. Price is WRONG about standing for the person over the values and he is wrong that Davis is over 80% Republican. First of all, Price claims that Sarah Davis is a good Republican other than being against life. He pulled that stat out of thin air because the truth is that all the major conservative organizations gave her failing grades after last session. Texas Eagle Forum gave her 36% for mostly social issues, Texans for Fiscal Responsibility gave her a C+ (below 80%) for fiscal issues, and Young Conservatives of Texas gave her 61% for overall conservative rating. Her pro-abortion beliefs are even clearer. She got a 100% rating from Planned Parenthood. Sorry, but you do not get 100% from Planned Parenthood unless you are absolutely 100 percent pro-abortion and in favor of everything Planned Parenthood does and wants to do.

4)      I agree that not everyone agrees 100% on everything and we should still work together, but if we do not Stand for our Republican Values then we will LOSE our Party and LOSE elections.

The Republican Party is not just about getting anyone elected who will put an R behind their name. If that were the case would you support Obama if one day he just decided to put an R behind his name instead of a D? You see, the Republican Party is not just about numbers or just about winning elections, the Republican Party is about a SET OF VALUES and the goal of the Party is to promote that set of values and get people elected who BELIEVE IN OUR REPUBLICAN VALUES. I too like Ronald Reagan’s 80% rule that says if someone believes in 80% or more of Republican values then they are your ally. I agree, and I work with and support candidates all the time that I do not 100% agree with. That being said, having an over 80% ally does not mean you just sit back and give a pass to someone who is for abortion just because they are a fellow Republican. You can still call them out on that issue and work with them on other issues. It is even ok to try to elect a better Republican to replace them, especially is they are a RINO like Sarah Davis.

NOT following the platform and not standing for our values is what is driving people away from the Republican Party.  Abortion is an important issue and is a pillar of our Party foundation. It is not just a wedge issue. The more the party tries to compromise our values the more the base will run away from the Party. Romney lost because the conservative base of the party did not show up to vote. They were not excited about a wishy washy, seemingly moderate Romney. You may think widening the tent by compromising on important values will help Republicans win but it will make us lose because for every moderate we add there is more than one conservative who we lose because they lose faith in the Party.

Sarah Davis does not have to be pro-abortion to win her district. Pro Life Ted Cruz won in her district with a better percentage than her!

Ted Cruz got elected in her district with a higher percentage than what she got. Cruz ran on pro-life platforms and they did BETTER than pro-abortion Sarah Davis in her own district! In the 2012 election Cruz got 55.4%. Davis underperformed them with 54.6%.


5)      Bob Price says the Republican Party of Texas did not violate the Party Platform by giving money to Pro-Abortion Candidate Sarah Davis.

FALSE: Last time I checked, the thousands of delegates at the Republican State Convention specifically put in the Party Platform a section that implores the Party to NOT give ANY Party funds to candidates who are not pro-life. Anyone with common sense would say that it is a clear violation of the platform, and against the will of the delegates, for the Party to give money to a candidate who is not pro-life. Price admits that the platform does call on the Party to withhold funds from non pro-life candidates, but he says that really it is up to the discretion of the Party. Really? Since when does the Party get to pick and choose which parts of the platform to follow? Candidates can pick and choose what they want I suppose but the PARTY officials are put in place by the delegates to UPHOLD the Party Platform and rules.

The platform does go on to call on the Party officials to make the platform pro-abortion money restriction an official rule. The Party has not done so. I never said the Party violated a rule. I only said they Party violated the platform, which they did when they gave money to a pro-abortion candidate even though the Platform calls on them not to do so and to make it an official rule not to do so.

6)      I NEVER said the Texas GOP should oppose Sarah Davis or support her Democrat opponent. I only said that the Party money should have gone to many other more important races to support more conservative, pro-life Republicans. Her race was not even that important in the big picture compared to other races.

I never said someone could not give their personal money to her race. I never said she Sarah Davis does not have the right to run and does not have the right to believe how she wants to believe. I only said that Party should follow the platform and not give Party money to pro-abortion candidates.

The fact is though, with so many races, the Party cannot and does not get involved in more than 90% or all races in Texas. With limited funds and resources, the Party should focus on getting involved in races where the Republican candidates uphold Republican values and where the Republican winning is of most importance. There were there many other races where the more conservative, pro-life Republican Candidates did not get help from the Party but could have used it. There was NEVER a threat of Republicans losing the strong majority in the Texas House. There is a big threat of conservative Republicans losing the hold on the State Board of Education. Hispanic Charlie Garza is a Republican State Board of Education member who lost his seat to a Democrat. Garza needed the money in his race more than Davis.

Furthermore, Bob Price did not mention in his article that I wanted to write an article about Davis last year, but he asked me to hold off because it might help her Democrat opponent in the General Election. Although I do not like Sarah Davis because of her beliefs, I did not want her Democrat opponent to win so I decided to hold off until after she won against her Democrat opponent and then I would expose her pro-abortion beliefs before the next primary so that hopefully another Republican will beat her.

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

One Step Closer: Texas House Passes New Abortion Limits

the following article is from The Blaze: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/07/10/one-step-closer-texas-house-passes-new-abortion-limits/


AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — The Texas House approved new abortion limits Wednesday in a second special session, less than two weeks after Senate Republicans failed to finish work on the bill amid a filibuster and raucous protests.
Texas House of Representatives Passes New Abortion Limits
Opponents of HB 2, an abortion bill, yell outside the Texas House after the bill is provisionally approved, Tuesday, July 9, 2013, in Austin, Texas. The bill passed a final, formal vote Wednesday. It requires doctors to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals, only allow abortions in surgical centers, dictate when abortion pills are taken and ban abortions after 20 weeks. (AP)
A final vote could be held as early as Friday in the Senate, where the measure died as the first special session expired. The House voted mostly along party lines on what has become signature GOP legislation.
Lawmakers spent more than 10 hours debating it Tuesday, and Republicans rejected every attempt to amend the bill. Throngs of protesters were missing for Wednesday’s mostly procedural vote after days of protests by supporters and opponents.
The bill requires doctors to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals, only allow abortions in surgical centers and ban abortions after 20 weeks.
The House gallery was largely empty Wednesday morning, with a smattering of the orange and blue T-shirts worn by opponents and supporters of the bill. This was in stark contrast to Tuesday night’s vote, when hundreds filled the Capitol rotunda chanting, “Shame on you!”
Planned Parenthood took their Stand With Texas Women campaign on the road Tuesday, rallying more than 1,100 supporters in downtown Houston to oppose the measure. The bus tour was expected in Dallas on Wednesday, with a speech by Fort Worth Sen. Wendy Davis, a rising Democratic star following her filibuster against the bill last month.
Texas House of Representatives Passes New Abortion Limits
Rep. Jason Villalba, R-Dallas, holds a sonogram showing his unborn son during final remarks before a final vote on HB 2, an abortion bill,Tuesday, July 9, 2013, in Austin, Texas. (AP)
No other issue in Texas has rallied Democratic voters, young activists and women’s right supporters in recent years like House Bill 2. The Texas Democratic Party has helped organize rallies opposing the bill and have used them to register new voters.
Gov. Rick Perry has made it a personal goal to end abortions in Texas, and voting for anti-abortion measures is a litmus test for Republican politicians. Conservative Christian groups keep scorecards on lawmaker’s voting records.
There is little Democrats can do to stop the measure in the Republican-controlled Legislature. But they have worked hard to enter into the legislative record testimony that opponents can use to convince a federal court to overturn the law before it can take effect.
They also say the Texas restrictions and those passed by other states conflict with the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which established that a woman has the right to get an abortion until her fetus could viably survive outside of the womb, which is generally at 22 to 24 weeks of the pregnancy.
Texas House of Representatives Passes New Abortion Limits
A woman carries a sign as she marches with other pro-abortion rights supporters through downtown Austin, Texas on Monday evening, July 8, 2013. The Texas House began debating a bill on Tuesday that would impose tough new restrictions on abortions. (AP)
Texas House of Representatives Passes New Abortion Limits
Supports of an abortion bill cheer during an anti-abortion rally at the Texas Capitol, Monday, July 8, 2013, in Austin, Texas. The fight over access to abortion in Texas resumed Monday with thousands expected to attend a marathon Senate hearing and a nighttime anti-abortion rally at the Capitol. (AP)
It’s unclear if the Texas restrictions could survive a court challenge. Federal courts have suspended aspects of the bill enacted by other states. On Monday, a federal judge blocked enforcement of a Wisconsin abortion law requiring admitting privileges.
The Texas Medical Association, the Texas Hospital Association and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology oppose the bill, calling it unnecessary.
Democratic Rep. Ruth McClendon, of San Antonio, made one last attempt to amend the bill Wednesday to add funding for the Adoption Assistance Program, which provides financial assistance to families that adopt children in the foster care system. Other Democrats said that if the bill passes, then the number of unintended pregnancies would increase and place greater demand on the foster system.
“If we don’t adopt this amendment, then we are saying that we don’t care about the children of Texas,” she said.
But the bill’s author Rep. Jody Laubenberg, R-Parker, said she opposed all amendments to her bill. She said the Legislature had appropriated enough money for foster children.

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Polls Show Public STRONGLY Favors Abortion Bans, Oppose Wendy Davis - Media Silent

the media went goo goo ga ga over Democrat Wendy Davis stalling a Texas bill that will ban abortions after 20 weeks. the acted like Texas is crazy and the people of America are against abortion restriction. WRONG! The truth is that the majority of Americans STRONGLY favor restrictions on abortions after the first trimester. Most other countries already ban abortions after even just 10 weeks.

WHERE IS THE MEDIA? WHY ARE THEY NOT REPORTING THAT PEOPLE WANT TO BAN KILLING BABIES AFTER THEY BEGIN TO DEVELOP?


the following article is from Real Clear Politics: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/06/30/the_public_doesnt_support_wendy_davis_position.html


The Public Doesn't Support Wendy Davis' Position

By Ben Domenech - June 30, 2013

Oh, my mistake. It’s actually around half of Americans who favor gay marriage. Those figures above are for the percentage of Americans who support banning abortion after the first trimester (13 weeks), and after the second trimester (28 weeks), respectively.
 
But that can’t be possible. Because if that was the case, wouldn’t we have heard about it, from the newspapers? Maybe they just haven’t gotten around to reporting it – a blind spot missed amidst all the other pressing news. Except – it looks like Americans have thought this for almost two decades. The percent supporting a second trimester ban has never dropped below 64 percent, and the percent supporting a third trimester ban has never dropped below 80 percent in that time. These positions are true elsewhere, too – once a baby starts looking like a baby, people tend to think it ought to be protected. That’s why most of Europe has bans on abortion ranging from 10 to 22 weeks, and the major countries have first trimester bans – Portugal at 10 weeks, Germany and Spain at 14 weeks, Italy at effectively the end of the first trimester. France is at 14 weeks as well, and they even mandate a one-week waiting period for all abortions. Most of these countries also have conscientious objection clauses designed to protect those doctors with moral objections to abortion.
On such a divisive issue, you’d think the fact that this broadly popular position has endured in America and around the world to such a degree would inform the political analysis of the media. But last night we saw how personally invested many in the media are in the limitless, on-demand abortion regime in their obvious cheerleading for Texas State Senator Wendy Davis, who was filibustering a Texas measure that would limit abortion to the 20 week mark and require a host of regulatory steps which would shut down most Texas abortion clinics. Most egregious of all was the point in the evening when reporters were actually urging protesters on, encouraging them to scream and shout to delay a floor vote on the measure. This went well beyond the bounds of journalism – and indeed was indistinguishable from the single-issue abortion activists. 
It was indistinguishable because the press is, by and large, unanimous on the issue. We saw this in the disinterested approach to reporting on the Kermit Gosnell trial (until pressured into it by Mollie Hemingway and Kristen Powers). Those who write about abortion as a political issue are only interested in reporting about abortion politics when they view it as an opportunity to press its agenda. You will see a great deal of reporting in the coming weeks about Davis’s rising political star – she’s ambitious, with statewide hopes – because the reporters view her as the activists do: a heroic, courageous figure, assaulted by the GOP’s war on women. But you’ll likely see little reporting about the fact that 62 percent of Texans support the 20 week ban she was filibustering. The agenda takes precedence. They know that fighting this bill now is better than fighting it before the Supreme Court.
Twenty weeks is, of course, an arbitrary mark to draw a line between protected under law and lump of cells. The general argument from the pro-lifers is that it is a point where the unborn obviously feel pain. Viability is a threshold that continues to move earlier thanks to medical science, and indeed some children born at 20 weeks have survived. But there’s something else that happens at around the 20 week mark: the unborn can distinguish sounds. The first sound they will hear is the voice of their mother. In the weeks to come it will be a soothing and recognizable sound, distinguishable from all the rest. They will respond to it and react to it, to changes in volume and conversation. Much later, they will even be able to recognize tones of voice. But at the twenty week mark, there is only the formless sound. The child cannot understand what she is saying. They cannot detect the difference in tenor when she makes the call, and schedules the appointment, and takes them from the waiting room into the operating room where they will die. They only recognize it as a mother’s voice, full of promise, enveloping them – familiar, reassuring, safe. 
Benjamin Domenech is editor of The Transom. Click here to subscribe.


Read more: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/06/30/the_public_doesnt_support_wendy_davis_position.html#ixzz2YL7flnR6
Follow us: @RCP_Articles on Twitter

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Dewhurst Says Straus Did not get Pro Life Bill to TX Senate in Time

Texas LT Governor David Dewhurst has partially blamed a mob for the failure of big Texas Special Session Pro-Life bills and he partially blamed The Texas House, under the leadership and scheduling of pro-choice Texas Speaker Joe Straus. Dewhurst says that the Senate did not get the bill from the House in time to pass it in the Senate. They had all Special session to pass the bill and the Texas Senate had a plan from the beginning but the House leadership drug their feet.

This is exactly what I have been saying all along! Straus has sabotaged all the pro-life bills this year. He killed the bills in regular session and in the special session he waited till the last minute to get the bills to the Senate so that there was not enough time for them to pass. He did the same thing with the big anti-TSA bill last session.

There will likely be a second special session called by Governor Perry to pass these pro-life bills.


previous articles:


LT Gov. Dewhurst: Mob Derailed Texas Abortion Vote - SB 5 Invalid - Another Special Session for Pro Life Bill?

read full story online here: http://www.texasconservativerepublicannews.com/2013/06/lt-gov-dewhurst-mob-derailed-texas.html


UPDATE: Is Texas Senate Midnight Abortion Vote INVALID due to Passed Deadline?

read full story online here: http://www.texasconservativerepublicannews.com/2013/06/update-is-texas-senate-midnight.html

Pro-Choice Mob Disrupts Texas Abortion Vote but Pro-Life Bill PASSES at Midnight after Filibuster
read full story online here: http://www.texasconservativerepublicannews.com/2013/06/pro-choice-mob-disrupts-texas-abortion-bill-special-session-filibuster.html


This Bill Should Have NEVER had to go to Special Session. It Should have been Passed in Regular Session but Speaker Joe Straus Killed It in Regular Session and pushed it to the end of the Special Session

The only reason that the pro life bill even had to go down to the wire in a special session is because Texas Speaker Joe Straus KILLED all pro life bills in the regular session. That is right, the Texas Senate was able to have time to debate and pass several pro-life bills in the regular session. These bills were sent to the Texas House where they would have EASILY passed the near super-majority Republican body. The problem is that the pro-choice Speaker Joe Straus did not allow his leadership to let the bills out of committee. They never even made it to the floor for a vote.

Texas pro-life LT Governor David Dewhurst asked for the bills to be added onto the special session because stopping unborn babies from suffering and increasing the health and protection of women is important to him. Joe Straus, like always, did not show any support for adding the pro-life bills to the special session and Straus even criticized Governor Perry for adding extra bills on the short 30 day special session (referring to the pro-life bills). Thankfully we have a pro-life Governor, Rick Perry, and he put the pro-life bills on the Special Session agenda.

Joe Straus cut the special session short a few days by sending the legislators home, even though Straus knew the special session was short and knew that these pro-life bills would be added by Perry. Straus then went on to schedule the pro-life bills at the very end of the special session knowing that the pro life bills, when passed by the House, would still need to go back to the Senate to be approved with little time left and with a much stronger Democrat presence in the Senate.

What Was Passed in the Pro Life Bill SB5?

Several important laws were passed in this pro-life bill. According to Texas Right to Life, Senate Bill 5 would affirm the state's interest in protecting the lives of preborn children who feel pain by banning abortion at 20 weeks post-fertilization.  Senate Bill 5 also requires all abortion clinics to meet the same health and safety regulations as an ambulatory surgical center, requires a doctor providing abortions to secure admitting privileges at a nearby hospital, and lastly, requires a doctor to personally administer the abortion-inducing drugs to the patient.

LT Gov. Dewhurst: Mob Derailed Texas Abortion Vote - SB 5 Invalid - Another Special Session for Pro Life Bill?

Texas LT Governor David Dewhurst has declared the Texas Pro Life Abortion Bill invalid due to "An unruly mob using Occupy Wall Street tactics." He then says to "see ya soon" which tells me that he expects a Governor Perry to call a second special session to pass the pro-life bills.


the following is from the Texas Tribune:

3:13 a.m. by Brandi Grissom
Without recognizing Sen. John Whitmire, D-Houston, for a motion to adjourn Sine Die, Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst stepped down from the dais after ruling that time had expired on SB 5, telling the senators, "It's been fun, but, um, see ya soon."
He then told reporters that "An unruly mob using Occupy Wall Street tactics" derailed legislation that was designed to protect women and babies.
He said he was "very frustrated."
"I didn't lose control of what we were doing," he told reporters. "We had an unruly mob."



previous articles:


UPDATE: Is Texas Senate Midnight Abortion Vote INVALID due to Passed Deadline?

read full story online here: http://www.texasconservativerepublicannews.com/2013/06/update-is-texas-senate-midnight.html

Pro-Choice Mob Disrupts Texas Abortion Vote but Pro-Life Bill PASSES at Midnight after Filibuster
read full story online here: http://www.texasconservativerepublicannews.com/2013/06/pro-choice-mob-disrupts-texas-abortion-bill-special-session-filibuster.html


This Bill Should Have NEVER had to go to Special Session. It Should have been Passed in Regular Session but Speaker Joe Straus Killed It in Regular Session and pushed it to the end of the Special Session

The only reason that the pro life bill even had to go down to the wire in a special session is because Texas Speaker Joe Straus KILLED all pro life bills in the regular session. That is right, the Texas Senate was able to have time to debate and pass several pro-life bills in the regular session. These bills were sent to the Texas House where they would have EASILY passed the near super-majority Republican body. The problem is that the pro-choice Speaker Joe Straus did not allow his leadership to let the bills out of committee. They never even made it to the floor for a vote.

Texas pro-life LT Governor David Dewhurst asked for the bills to be added onto the special session because stopping unborn babies from suffering and increasing the health and protection of women is important to him. Joe Straus, like always, did not show any support for adding the pro-life bills to the special session and Straus even criticized Governor Perry for adding extra bills on the short 30 day special session (referring to the pro-life bills). Thankfully we have a pro-life Governor, Rick Perry, and he put the pro-life bills on the Special Session agenda.

Joe Straus cut the special session short a few days by sending the legislators home, even though Straus knew the special session was short and knew that these pro-life bills would be added by Perry. Straus then went on to schedule the pro-life bills at the very end of the special session knowing that the pro life bills, when passed by the House, would still need to go back to the Senate to be approved with little time left and with a much stronger Democrat presence in the Senate.

What Was Passed in the Pro Life Bill SB5?

Several important laws were passed in this pro-life bill. According to Texas Right to Life, Senate Bill 5 would affirm the state's interest in protecting the lives of preborn children who feel pain by banning abortion at 20 weeks post-fertilization.  Senate Bill 5 also requires all abortion clinics to meet the same health and safety regulations as an ambulatory surgical center, requires a doctor providing abortions to secure admitting privileges at a nearby hospital, and lastly, requires a doctor to personally administer the abortion-inducing drugs to the patient.

UPDATE: Is Texas Senate Midnight Abortion Vote INVALID due to Passed Deadline?

URGENT UPDATE: There is still a dispute as to whether or not the midnight vote was valid because of the confusion of when the vote was taken due to the loud mobs that disrupted the vote. Even though the special session is technically over and the Texas Legislature website says the vote was taken and the bill was passed before midnight, the Senate is meeting here momentarily and will vote on whether to accept the pro-life vote as valid and before midnight or to strike it as invalid because it came too late.....

If the Senate votes to invalidate the vote, will Perry call another special session? I bet he does!


previous article:


Pro-Choice Mob Disrupts Texas Abortion Vote but Pro-Life Bill PASSES at Midnight after Filibuster
read full story online here: http://www.texasconservativerepublicannews.com/2013/06/pro-choice-mob-disrupts-texas-abortion-bill-special-session-filibuster.html


This Bill Should Have NEVER had to go to Special Session. It Should have been Passed in Regular Session but Speaker Joe Straus Killed It in Regular Session and pushed it to the end of the Special Session

The only reason that the pro life bill even had to go down to the wire in a special session is because Texas Speaker Joe Straus KILLED all pro life bills in the regular session. That is right, the Texas Senate was able to have time to debate and pass several pro-life bills in the regular session. These bills were sent to the Texas House where they would have EASILY passed the near super-majority Republican body. The problem is that the pro-choice Speaker Joe Straus did not allow his leadership to let the bills out of committee. They never even made it to the floor for a vote.

Texas pro-life LT Governor David Dewhurst asked for the bills to be added onto the special session because stopping unborn babies from suffering and increasing the health and protection of women is important to him. Joe Straus, like always, did not show any support for adding the pro-life bills to the special session and Straus even criticized Governor Perry for adding extra bills on the short 30 day special session (referring to the pro-life bills). Thankfully we have a pro-life Governor, Rick Perry, and he put the pro-life bills on the Special Session agenda.

Joe Straus cut the special session short a few days by sending the legislators home, even though Straus knew the special session was short and knew that these pro-life bills would be added by Perry. Straus then went on to schedule the pro-life bills at the very end of the special session knowing that the pro life bills, when passed by the House, would still need to go back to the Senate to be approved with little time left and with a much stronger Democrat presence in the Senate.

What Was Passed in the Pro Life Bill SB5?

Several important laws were passed in this pro-life bill. According to Texas Right to Life, Senate Bill 5 would affirm the state's interest in protecting the lives of preborn children who feel pain by banning abortion at 20 weeks post-fertilization.  Senate Bill 5 also requires all abortion clinics to meet the same health and safety regulations as an ambulatory surgical center, requires a doctor providing abortions to secure admitting privileges at a nearby hospital, and lastly, requires a doctor to personally administer the abortion-inducing drugs to the patient.

Pro-Choice Mob Disrupts Texas Abortion Vote but Pro-Life Bill PASSES at Midnight after Filibuster

URGENT UPDATE: There is still a dispute as to whether or not the midnight vote was valid because of the confusion of when the vote was taken due to the loud mobs that disrupted the vote. Even though the special session is technically over and the Texas Legislature website says the vote was taken and the bill was passed before midnight, the Senate is meeting here momentarily and will vote on whether to accept the pro-life vote as valid and before midnight or to strike it as invalid because it came too late.....

If the Senate votes to invalidate the vote, will Perry call another special session? I bet he does!



One of the most sweeping pro-life bills in the history of Texas has passed the 2013 Texas Legislature special session at the stroke of midnight without even a minute to spare. Democrats are arguing that the vote might not have finished being taken before the midnight deadline, but Republicans point out that the vote started before the midnight deadline and therefore the vote that started before the midnight deadline is valid.

The reason that there is uncertainty about the vote is due to the pro death, I mean pro-choice mob that was in the Texas State Senate Chamber screaming and banging on things to make noise to try to disrupt the procedures. This mob acted in a shameful, illegal manner and had to be kicked out by the police. There is absolutely NO RIGHT for someone, no matter what side they are on, to be able to disrupt a vote of the Texas Legislature. These people should have been removed much sooner when they first started to become disruptive instead of them being allowed to be in the chamber screaming until the stroke of midnight so that it was hard to even take the final vote. The situation was so crazy and tense that at one point the live stream of the Texas Senate Abortion Debate reached over 110,000 viewers at one time.

I am not sure what the Democrats and pro-abortion activists thought they were going to accomplish. Pro-Life Texas Governor Rick Perry would have just called a second special session and the bill would have passed anyways.

State Senator Wendy Davis had tried to filibuster the pro-life bill by talking most of the day today without taking a break. The Texas Senate rules on filibuster are very strict though and Davis was not even allowed to stray from discussing the bill at hand and could not take any breaks or even sit down. She did stray though twice and was also helped once by a fellow State Senator and so her filibuster ended with only about 2 hours before the midnight deadline. That is when the Democrats tried to stall by asking points of information. Eventually the Republicans forced the question so that the bill could be voted on. During all of this debate, some of the Texas Democrat women even tried to make sexist remarks about how the Republican men were the ones who wanted to force this onto women. They of course were blatantly ignoring the several Republican women Legislators who fought for this bill because it is for the best for women and innocent unborn babies.

This Bill Should Have NEVER had to go to Special Session. It Should have been Passed in Regular Session but Speaker Joe Straus Killed It in Regular Session and pushed it to the end of the Special Session

The only reason that the pro life bill even had to go down to the wire in a special session is because Texas Speaker Joe Straus KILLED all pro life bills in the regular session. That is right, the Texas Senate was able to have time to debate and pass several pro-life bills in the regular session. These bills were sent to the Texas House where they would have EASILY passed the near super-majority Republican body. The problem is that the pro-choice Speaker Joe Straus did not allow his leadership to let the bills out of committee. They never even made it to the floor for a vote.

Texas pro-life LT Governor David Dewhurst asked for the bills to be added onto the special session because stopping unborn babies from suffering and increasing the health and protection of women is important to him. Joe Straus, like always, did not show any support for adding the pro-life bills to the special session and Straus even criticized Governor Perry for adding extra bills on the short 30 day special session (referring to the pro-life bills). Thankfully we have a pro-life Governor, Rick Perry, and he put the pro-life bills on the Special Session agenda.

Joe Straus cut the special session short a few days by sending the legislators home, even though Straus knew the special session was short and knew that these pro-life bills would be added by Perry. Straus then went on to schedule the pro-life bills at the very end of the special session knowing that the pro life bills, when passed by the House, would still need to go back to the Senate to be approved with little time left and with a much stronger Democrat presence in the Senate.

What Was Passed in the Pro Life Bill SB5?

Several important laws were passed in this pro-life bill. According to Texas Right to Life, Senate Bill 5 would affirm the state's interest in protecting the lives of preborn children who feel pain by banning abortion at 20 weeks post-fertilization.  Senate Bill 5 also requires all abortion clinics to meet the same health and safety regulations as an ambulatory surgical center, requires a doctor providing abortions to secure admitting privileges at a nearby hospital, and lastly, requires a doctor to personally administer the abortion-inducing drugs to the patient.