Ted Cruz Bill calls for 5 Million dollar Bounty on Heads of Benghazi Terrorists

Now we are talking. If this bill from Texas US Senator Ted Cruz passes, we might actually catch the terrorists who attacked the American Embassy in Benghazi, Libya. The United States of America frequently announces million dollar rewards for all kinds of wanted criminals. The most recent reward was created for information leading to the capture of a Mexican Drug Lord. These million dollar rewards work because, well, people like money and will give up information they know for money. So why has the United States NOT already put out a reward for information leading to the capture of the Benghazi terrorists? It is almost as if the Obama administration does not want to find the terrorists because it would expose even more about the botched ""anti Muslim video" cover-up by Obama's administration. Thank you Senator Ted Cruz for taking a stand and really putting forth an effort to find these terrorists.

The following is a press release from U.S. Senator Ted Cruz:

Cruz Proposes Bill to Offer Reward on Benghazi Terrorists

Contact: press@cruz.senate.gov / (202) 228-7561
Thursday, November 7, 2013

WASHINGTON, DC -- U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) today introduced legislation to require the Secretary of State to offer a reward of up to $5 million for information on the Benghazi attacks or information that leads to the capture and prosecution of a suspect.

"The State Department's Rewards for Justice Program exists to help the U.S. identify and apprehend its enemies, but the Obama Administration has not used it to pursue the terrorists who attacked our personnel in Benghazi," Cruz said. "This legislation enables the Secretary of State to offer a substantial reward for information leading to the apprehension and prosecution of the suspects who have been identified. U.S. investigators should have all available tools at their disposal to bring to justice those who murdered four Americans in Benghazi, including the first Ambassador killed in service since 1979."

The Rewards for Justice program has been a visible and successful element in the ongoing battle against terrorism. Since 1984, over $125 million has been distributed to more than 80 people.

To date, there has been no reward offered for the Benghazi terrorist suspects under the Rewards for Justice Program. Earlier this week, the State Department announced that they are giving out up to $5 million in exchange for info on drug lords. They did this without any new authorizing or appropriating legislation.

Last year, then-Senator Kerry and Senator Coons offered similar legislation to expand the Rewards for Justice program to help capture Joseph Kony. This bill passed the Senate unanimously and was enacted into law last year.

###

Sen. Cruz's Bill to Offer Reward on Benghazi Terrorists

2012 RNC Benghazi Attack Ad That Never Aired - Romney Pulled Plug on Exposing Obama's 9/11 Attack Scandal

I always thought that Romney would have had a better chance to win if he had really gone after Obama on the Benghazi coverup... there was never a riot about a video and Americans died with no plan in place to go save them in case of a terrorist attack. Obama had not been to his security briefings, it was the week of September 11 and thee was chatter about a 9/11 attack. Romney went soft and made alot of people mad by not going after Obama over the Libya Islamic terrorist attack. The one time that Rmoney did finally mention it was in a debate with Obama and Obama was quickly able to change the subject and twist round Romney's words.

Apparently, we now know tht the RNC even had an attack ad ready to air but Romney pulled the plug on the ad.

We now know for certain that there was a coverup and massive failure by Obama's Secretary of State Department. This scandal could have come out before Obama's election but Romney pulled the plug.

from Breitbart.com: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/05/09/2012-RNC-Benghazi-Attack-Ad-That-Never-Aired

by Wynton Hall 9 May 2013 post a comment

ABC News has uncovered a hard-hitting 2012 Republican National Committee (RNC) television ad attacking President Barack Obama for failed leadership on Benghazi that never ran after the Romney campaign objected over concerns the spot would detract from Romney’s focus on the economy.

The ad, which is based on Hillary Clinton’s famous “3 a.m. phone call” from her failed 2008 presidential run, features a ringing phone that goes unanswered as images of the flaming U.S. consulate in Libya appear on the screen.

“The Call Came…On September 12, 2012,” reads the screen. “Security Requests Denied. Four Americans Dead. And an Administration whose story is still changing. The Call Came.”

As Breitbart News reported exclusively, in the week leading up to the terrorist attacks that claimed the life of U.S. Libyan Ambassador Chris Stevens and three members of his staff, the White House calendar showed no public record of Obama attending his daily intelligence briefings.

A study by the Government Accountability Institute revealed that Obama attended just 43.8% of his daily intelligence briefings in his first 1,225 days in office.

Click below to watch the video:

ON BREITBART TV

WATCH: RNC Benghazi Attack Ad That Never Ran http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/05/09/2012-RNC-Benghazi-Attack-Ad-That-Never-Aired

OUTRAGE! Obama Fires General and Admiral for Trying to SAVE Libya Ambassador from Terrorists

A General and Admiral who have been fired for trying to help save American lives during the Libya Embassy 9/11 terrorist attack. They tried to send help during the attack but were told to stand down Obama's administration. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! Why did Obama not let out troops save these Americans? Why did Obama not send help to the Ambassador months ago after the Ambassador said there was a high risk of a terrorist attack. Why did Obama keep talking about a youtube video after the attack instead of saying it was a terrorist attack?

OBAMA MUST BE DEFEATED IN THIS ELECTION BEFORE HE DESTROYS AMERICA

The following is an email I got regarding this situation:

Last week, Obama ordered the immediate removal of Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette from his command of the powerful Carrier Strike Group Three (CSG-3) currently located in the Middle East.

US news reports on Obama’s unprecedented firing of a powerful US Navy Commander during wartime state that Admiral Gaouette’s removal was for “allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment” that arose during the strike group’s deployment to the Middle East.

This GRU report, however, states that Admiral Gaouette’s firing by President Obama was due to this strike force commander disobeying orders when he ordered his forces on 11 September to “assist and provide intelligence for” American military forces ordered into action by US Army General Carter Ham, who was then the commander of the United States Africa Command (AFRICOM), against terrorist forces attacking the American Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

General Ham had been in command of the initial 2011 US-NATO military intervention in Libya who, like Admiral Gaouette, was fired by Obama. And as we can, in part, read from US military insider accounts of this growing internal conflict between the White House and US Military leaders:

“The information I heard today was that General [Carter] Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready.

General Ham then received the order to stand down. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command.”