Allen West: Will Obama Identify with Black Teens Who Killed White Boy for Fun?

from The Daily Caller:

On the heels of news that three Oklahoma teens allegedly shot and killed an Australian jogger for sport, former Florida Republican Rep. Allen West lashed out at President Obama and the “race industry crew.”
“‘We were bored & decided to kill somebody.’ 3 black teens shoot white jogger.Who will POTUS identify w/this time?” West tweeted Tuesday afternoon with a link to a New York Post article on the matter.

Following the acquittal of shooter George Zimmerman for the murder of Florida teen Trayvon Martin, Obama said that Martin ”could have been me 35 years ago.” Earlier, Obama had said that if he had a son, “he’d look like Trayvon.”
West cast a wider net on Facebook.
“[S]hall we hear anything from the race industry crew, Hollywood elites, or maybe Oprah Winfrey? The issue is not about proliferation of guns in America. This is about a failing black community and the fact that its young men are desensitized to violence because a gangsta culture promotes it,” West wrote on Facebook, reiterating his Twitter question. “So who will President Obama identify with in this case?”
Chancey Allen Luna, 16, and James Francis Edwards Jr., 15, have been charged with first-degree murder in the Friday shooting death of Australian baseball player Chris Lane in Duncan, Oklahoma. Michael Dewayne Jones, 17, is being charged with the use of a vehicle in the discharge of a weapon and accessory after the fact to murder.
Jones told police that the teens killed Lane “for the fun of it” and because they “were bored and decided to kill somebody.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/21/allen-west-on-bored-teen-murderers-who-will-president-obama-identify-with-in-this-case/#ixzz2cqCCMYvf

2012 Democrat Platform is HORRIBLE - God Booed, Obama 200 times, Partial Birth Abortions Paid by Taxes

Read the Full 2012 Democrat Party Platform here: http://www.democrats.org/democratic-national-platform?source=DNC_TW


The Democrats took God and Support for Israel out of their platform but then after they got some bad press they added them back in. Even the vote to add God back in to the platform was a divided vote with half of the Democrat crowd yelling NO. Does this represent America? NO!

The Democratic Platform was in favor of late term (9th month!) and partial birth abortions funded by our tax dollars.

Even just as disturbing is that the 2012 Democrat Platform mentions Obama by name over 200 times! A Party Platform is not supposed to be about a person or in support of a person. A Party Platform is supposed to be a set of values and beliefs. The people of a party are people who prescribe to the party platform. It is not the other way around. The party should not build itself around a candidate! The party should be built around a set of beliefs! Well, that is what the Democrats have done. They have no beliefs or values, they just believe whatever Obama says and does. They have built their platform around him. In contrast, the Republicans only mentioned Mitt Romney once in the Republican Platform and that was only in the Introduction and the the platform itself!


Watch this Allen West Campaign YouTube Video: Three times they said no to God

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNQuT2worqc&feature=youtu.be





Here is what Liberty Institute had to say about the Removal of God Controversy at the DNC 2012:

Wednesday, delegates of the Democratic National Convention voted to add the mention of God back into the party platform, but not everyone in the Charlotte arena was happy about the announcement as many booed and shook their fists.

The party received criticism the day before for removing God from the platform, which was included in 2008. They also eliminated the mention of Jerusalem, but that was added back in with Wednesday’s vote as well.

The elimination of God from the Democratic Party platform appears to be consistent with the current administration that has been working very hard to remove God from the public arena altogether. Although the mention of God was voted back in, it is disappointing that the delegates were so divided on the issue and that the announcement evoked such a negative reaction from the crowd. It is the harsh reality of where we are headed as a nation, and a very real example of the growing hostility to religious freedom.

"Blacks for Obama" Racially Segregates Voters - Affirmative Action in Supreme Court

During Black History Month, Obama released a new video announcing the launch of BLACKS FOR OBAMA. (see video below)

This is an attempt to segregate voters based on RACE instead of voters joining together in groups based on VALUES. Minorities actually tend to be conservative in their beliefs and they are waking up to the realization that Obama is WAY TOO LIBERAL. So what do you do? You take the focus off of the values and you put the focus on race and drive a racial divide through the Heart of America.

Not only is it racist to segregate voters by race, it also shows how hypocritical things are in America.

Whites for Romney? Whites for Clinton? Whites for anyone White who wants to run for office? Of course those groups would never exist in America. That would be racist! But blacks for Obama is not racially dividing at all right? For the record, I would be against any groups (white, black, Hispanic) that are formed together solely on the basis of race instead of formed on the basis of values. I believe people should vote for someone based on the content of their character and not the color of their skin. I don't care if you are black, white, Hispanic or whatever. I will vote for you if you are a conservative and I will vote against you if you are a liberal. I fully support Ted Cruz for US Senate (Cuban) and one of my most favorite Texas State Representatives, and one of the most conservative Republican State Representatives in Texas, is State Representative James White (Black).