Friday, January 14, 2011
Joe Straus Opposition NOT anti-Semitic
I am tired of hearing the liberal media try to say that Hardin County Conservative Peter Morrison was "anti-semitic" because of his opposition to Straus. It is funny how the liberal media, and the moderates and democrats who supported Straus, all try to deflect debating the actual issues by making absurd claims of anti-semitism. Give me a break. Peter Morrison did not even mention that Straus was a Jew. Peter rightly pointed out that Straus's spiritual leader and mentor was for abortion and on the planned parenthood board. That has nothing to do with religion and has everything to do with whether or not Joe Straus is for killing babies. Take the fact that his mentor is for killing babies and add that to Straus's own words that he is fine with abortion laws and that he believes abortion is just a "wedge issue" and well, you get the idea, he does not care about the babies that are getting killed in the modern day genocide called abortion. It had nothing to do with religion and everything to do with abortion. But I guess if you were backed up against the wall and did not want to debate the facts then you might throw out an absurd claim of anti-semitism to distract people too.
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Joe Straus Re- Elected – Still a GREAT year ahead!
Joe Straus Re- Elected – Still a GREAT year ahead!
Joe Straus was re-elected today. Congratulations
It was no secret that I was in favor of a new speaker because I am elected to the State Republican Executive Committee to protect and preserve our Republican platform and beliefs. I believed that someone who agreed most of the time with the Republican platform would be better suited to be the lead the Republican majority than someone who sometimes agrees with the ideas of the Republican Platform. Anyone in politics knows that it is hard to oust the person in power and that proved to be true today.
That being said, Joe Straus was elected and I respect that he is the speaker and we need to come together and move forward. That does not mean we have to forget come next State Rep election cycle which of our representatives did not listen to their constituents. But right now we certainly must move forward and come together and try to have a productive legislative session. The Speaker election is over so let’s come together on the Republican Ideas that we agree on and work together to make things happen. It is ok to have different opinions about people or ideas, but at the end of the day we MUST come together and get through the legislative session.
To be honest, this might be a GREAT legislative session. You see, when Straus got backed up against the wall with claims that he was not conservative enough, he started making huge conservative promises to conservative reps to secure votes. Promises he might never have made before. I believe he will hold to those promises because he will be working extra hard to prove he is conservative. On top of that, all of the conservative State Reps who voted for Straus against the desire of their constituents will now have to work extra hard to push conservative legislation this session to make their constituents happy and not want to kick them out of office.
So at the end of the day, If Joe Straus keeps his conservative promises, and if the conservative State Reps are working extra hard to make their constituents happy again, then this can be a great year for Conservative Republican legislation. But it took conservatives standing up and making noise to get these promises made so thank you everyone who stood up and said we need to stand more closely to our Republican values.
So Joe Straus, I did not support you for speaker, but if you hold true to your promises you made to allow fiscal AND social conservative agenda to move forward, then this could be an amazing year for the Republican Party and I really look forward to seeing what we can accomplish together now that the speaker race is over.
Now let’s get to work!
Sincerely,
David Bellow
State Republican Executive Committeeman – Senate District 3
www.DavidBellow.com
Sunday, January 2, 2011
Hardin County Resident, David Bellow. is Battalion Soldier of the Year
*Lumberton Resident is Soldier of the Year*
The Hardin County Conservatives is Proud to Announce that the 1/133
FA Battalion Soldier of the Year, for the second year in a row, is our very own Hardin County Conservative David
Bellow.
Specialist Bellow, 26, rose to the top of his
Army National Guard unit with several outstanding accomplishments this past year
to become his unit's Soldier of the Year. He then
went up to the Battalion level where he went up against the best soldiers
of the other units in the Battalion. He won at the
Battalion level to become the Battalion Soldier of the year. The Soldier
of the Year represents everything a soldier should be from physical
abilities to Army knowledge. He will then be pushed up to the Brigade
level competition to be considered for the Brigade Soldier of the year and then
the next step would be state and then national soldier of the year
competitions.
On top of receiving an award for his outstanding achievement, SPC Bellow will
have his picture displayed for a year at the entrance to the 1/133 FA
Battalion Headquarters on College Street in Beaumont, TX.
Bellow is going to Officer Candidate School and is training to be an Officer.
www.DavidBellow.com
The Hardin County Conservatives is Proud to Announce that the 1/133
FA Battalion Soldier of the Year, for the second year in a row, is our very own Hardin County Conservative David
Bellow.
Specialist Bellow, 26, rose to the top of his
Army National Guard unit with several outstanding accomplishments this past year
to become his unit's Soldier of the Year. He then
went up to the Battalion level where he went up against the best soldiers
of the other units in the Battalion. He won at the
Battalion level to become the Battalion Soldier of the year. The Soldier
of the Year represents everything a soldier should be from physical
abilities to Army knowledge. He will then be pushed up to the Brigade
level competition to be considered for the Brigade Soldier of the year and then
the next step would be state and then national soldier of the year
competitions.
On top of receiving an award for his outstanding achievement, SPC Bellow will
have his picture displayed for a year at the entrance to the 1/133 FA
Battalion Headquarters on College Street in Beaumont, TX.
Bellow is going to Officer Candidate School and is training to be an Officer.
www.DavidBellow.com
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
my mom, Paula Bellow, is with Jesus
Paula Bellow Funeral Service this Thursday 10AM
The funeral service will be at 10am this Thursday (December 23rd) at Calvary Baptist Church on Dowlen in Beaumont, TX we will not only remember and celebrate her LIFE in Christ but we will also rejoice that our mom is now in the presence of her God and Savior, seeing him face to face, full of Glory and great joy. There will also be a reception at her daughter’s home (123 Selman St, Lumberton, TX) following the memorial service. If you would like to visit with our family before then, there will be a visitation at Broussard’s Mortuary tomorrow (Wednesday, December 22nd) from 5pm – 8pm on Hwy 96 in Silsbee, TX.
Thank you everyone for your prayers, emails and support. Jesus listened and she went peacefully into the arms of Christ. That is the best Christmas present she could ever get.
Paula Bellow raised 10 children who love and serve the Lord. She would tell everyone about Jesus everywhere she went and she touched literally thousands of lives through her years of ministry and many came to know Jesus because they saw Jesus in her. Even though she was dying of cancer she praised Jesus everywhere she went. Calvary Baptist Beaumont made a video of her talking about her cancer and praising God. (I will post the amazing testimony video on youtube) The faith she displayed showed others that Jesus is real and gave them faith.
Click Here to see video of Paula Bellow Praising God even though dying of Cancer. Amazing Testimony Video!
She loved Jesus and her family and God did amazing miracles in her life to get her this far and God allowed her family to all be with her and talk to her before the passed. But we did not say goodbye and only said see you later. We might mourn but not like those who do not know Christ. Our mourning comes with the Hope and Joy that she is with Jesus and we will see her again.
Praise God for his amazing plan. May others know Him and the peace and salvation He brings.
In Christ,
David Bellow
The funeral service will be at 10am this Thursday (December 23rd) at Calvary Baptist Church on Dowlen in Beaumont, TX we will not only remember and celebrate her LIFE in Christ but we will also rejoice that our mom is now in the presence of her God and Savior, seeing him face to face, full of Glory and great joy. There will also be a reception at her daughter’s home (123 Selman St, Lumberton, TX) following the memorial service. If you would like to visit with our family before then, there will be a visitation at Broussard’s Mortuary tomorrow (Wednesday, December 22nd) from 5pm – 8pm on Hwy 96 in Silsbee, TX.
Thank you everyone for your prayers, emails and support. Jesus listened and she went peacefully into the arms of Christ. That is the best Christmas present she could ever get.
Paula Bellow raised 10 children who love and serve the Lord. She would tell everyone about Jesus everywhere she went and she touched literally thousands of lives through her years of ministry and many came to know Jesus because they saw Jesus in her. Even though she was dying of cancer she praised Jesus everywhere she went. Calvary Baptist Beaumont made a video of her talking about her cancer and praising God. (I will post the amazing testimony video on youtube) The faith she displayed showed others that Jesus is real and gave them faith.
Click Here to see video of Paula Bellow Praising God even though dying of Cancer. Amazing Testimony Video!
She loved Jesus and her family and God did amazing miracles in her life to get her this far and God allowed her family to all be with her and talk to her before the passed. But we did not say goodbye and only said see you later. We might mourn but not like those who do not know Christ. Our mourning comes with the Hope and Joy that she is with Jesus and we will see her again.
Praise God for his amazing plan. May others know Him and the peace and salvation He brings.
In Christ,
David Bellow
Friday, December 17, 2010
David Bellow to submit Motion for Summary Judgment in Obamacare Lawsuit
Southeast Texas Resident, David Bellow, will file a Motion for Summary Judgment in his individual lawsuit against the Federal Government regarding the Healthcare Bill.
Bellow filed the lawsuit pro se the day after the Healthcare Bill was passed. Bellow argued that the federal government does not have the constitutional authority to force him to engage in commerce by forcing him to purchase a private health insurance plan or face a penalty. This is also known as the individual mandate requirement of the Healthcare Bill. Bellow also argued that the bill would violate his 4th amendment rights because the government would have full and unwarranted access to his private health records (and those of all Americans) in order to determine if he has “qualified insurance” or not. It would also violate his rights by not allowing him to make his own health decisions because the plaintiff’s private health decisions might not fit the government’s standard of what they determine to be “qualified”.
The Motion for Summary Judgment is a request asking the presiding judge to rule on the constitutionality of the healthcare bill without needing to go to a trial.
Along with the Motion for Summary Judgment, Bellow will provide, as evidence, a copy of the ruling from Commonwealth of Virginia vs. Sebelius. The federal judge in that case granted the plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and ruled that the individual mandate section of the Healthcare Bill was unconstitutional. This ruling sets a precedent that should be carried over to Bellow’s case and Bellow’s Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted and the presiding judge should rule in favor of the plaintiff by declaring the healthcare bill unconstitutional.
Timetable of events:
1) Bellow filed lawsuit against Obamacare – click here
2) Government responded with a Motion to Dismiss claiming Plaintiff has no standing
3) Bellow responds to Motion to Dismiss claiming he does have standing – click here
4) Bellow will file Motion for Summary Judgment on Monday, Dec. 20th, 2010
Click here for a copy of Commonwealth of Virginia vs. Sebelius
Bellow filed the lawsuit pro se the day after the Healthcare Bill was passed. Bellow argued that the federal government does not have the constitutional authority to force him to engage in commerce by forcing him to purchase a private health insurance plan or face a penalty. This is also known as the individual mandate requirement of the Healthcare Bill. Bellow also argued that the bill would violate his 4th amendment rights because the government would have full and unwarranted access to his private health records (and those of all Americans) in order to determine if he has “qualified insurance” or not. It would also violate his rights by not allowing him to make his own health decisions because the plaintiff’s private health decisions might not fit the government’s standard of what they determine to be “qualified”.
The Motion for Summary Judgment is a request asking the presiding judge to rule on the constitutionality of the healthcare bill without needing to go to a trial.
Along with the Motion for Summary Judgment, Bellow will provide, as evidence, a copy of the ruling from Commonwealth of Virginia vs. Sebelius. The federal judge in that case granted the plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and ruled that the individual mandate section of the Healthcare Bill was unconstitutional. This ruling sets a precedent that should be carried over to Bellow’s case and Bellow’s Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted and the presiding judge should rule in favor of the plaintiff by declaring the healthcare bill unconstitutional.
Timetable of events:
1) Bellow filed lawsuit against Obamacare – click here
2) Government responded with a Motion to Dismiss claiming Plaintiff has no standing
3) Bellow responds to Motion to Dismiss claiming he does have standing – click here
4) Bellow will file Motion for Summary Judgment on Monday, Dec. 20th, 2010
Click here for a copy of Commonwealth of Virginia vs. Sebelius
David Bellow Response to Government's Motion to Dismiss in Obamacare Lawsuit
The Federal Government filed a motion to dismiss my lawsuit that claims Obamacare is unconstitutional.
Below is my response to the Motion to Dismiss:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Beaumont Division
Michael David Bellow Jr.
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION NO: 1:10-CV-00165
JUDGE RON CLARK
MAGISTRATE KEITH F. GIBLIN
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al.’
Defendants.
___________________________________________/
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
1) The United States Constitution, in Article III, section 2, gives Federal District Courts jurisdiction to hear cases involving constitutional rights and federal law. This is called Federal Question Jurisdiction.
This Plaintiff’s complaint clearly pertains to issues involving constitutional rights and federal laws, and is not just simply one individual’s dislike of government policy.
2) Standing is simply the plaintiff’s ability to show the court that the law in question is connected to a harm that the plaintiff is or will receive. The law will clearly affect the plaintiff because the plaintiff is forced to pay for a private health service or pay a penalty to the government.
The plaintiff did not present more information about himself in the original complaint, other than he is an American Citizen, because that is all the information needed because this law applies to ALL American citizens.
The Defendants, in their motion the dismiss, admit that all American citizens must maintain a minimum level of health insurance coverage or face a penalty starting in 2014, unless the individual is exempt. Here is the information about the plaintiff that the court needs: The plaintiff is a 26 year old working male and does not get free health insurance coverage and is not exempt from having coverage. Therefore the plaintiff must pay for health insurance coverage, a private health service, or the government will penalize the plaintiff, therefore directly damaging the plaintiff through an unconstitutional extension of power that amounts to a direct tax. The penalty not going into effect until 2014 has no effect on the fact that, as the law stands, the plaintiff must pay for private healthcare coverage or face a government penalty. The plaintiff does not need to wait until he is hurt to file a lawsuit when the plaintiff can clearly show that he WILL be hurt. This lawsuit is to prevent the plaintiff from being hurt by a clearly foreseeable damage.
The damages do not only pertain to a monetary penalty. The damages also pertain to a direct infringement of plaintiff’s constitutional rights. Even if the defendants offered free health insurance coverage for the plaintiff, the fact is that the plaintiff has no option to not have any health care coverage at all. Nowhere does the constitution allow the government to force all individuals to have health insurance. The defendants might have a constitutional authority to regulate commerce and regulate health insurance, but the defendants do not have any constitutional authority to force all individuals to actually engage in said commerce. For instance, the government can regulate the auto industry, but the government cannot force everyone to buy or have a car (even if it was given to them for free). The defendants cite Baldwin v. Sebelius as a reason to dismiss the plaintiff’s case because in Baldwin v. Sebelius the court dismissed the case because the plaintiff could have changes in his job or age that would qualify him for minimum coverage by 2014. This does not apply to the plaintiff because the plaintiff in this case does not want minimum coverage by 2014 and instead the plaintiff believes it is his constitutional right to decide to have no private health coverage at all and the defendants forcing the plaintiff to have coverage extends beyond the defendants’ authority and infringes on the plaintiff’s constitutional rights.
The damages also extend to an infringement of plaintiff’s personal medical decisions and the privacy of their medical records. The defendants, in their motion to dismiss, state that some individuals will be exempt if they can show that they have a health insurance policy that would qualify as minimum coverage. This statement opens up an entirely different and more complex issue than what has already been addressed. First of all, how will the government know whether or not to penalize plaintiff for not having qualifying health insurance unless the government has complete access to plaintiff’s private health records, which would be an infringement of an individual’s fourth amendment rights. Second, what is considered qualifying health insurance? This seems to indicate that the government will approve all healthcare plans. That means that the plaintiff’s private treatment choices could be determined by what the government determines that all health insurances must offer, or not offer, in order to be qualified. This practice of the government determining what qualifying health insurance is will predetermines plaintiff’s potential treatment options. The defendants determining what is qualifying or not could also go against an individual’s First Amendment rights. If the government says that, in order to be qualified, all health insurance policies must offer abortion, and the plaintiff does not believe in paying for abortions because it is against his religion, then that individual is being deprived of their right to practice their religious beliefs. These questions of how the defendants will access plaintiff’s personal health records, and how the defendants will determine what is qualifying insurance, present issues that are serious enough to be examined by the court.
Conclusion
The defendants’ Motion to Dismiss should not be granted.
Respectfully submitted and signed this 11th day of December, 2010
_______________________________
Plaintiff, Michael David Bellow Jr.
Below is my response to the Motion to Dismiss:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Beaumont Division
Michael David Bellow Jr.
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION NO: 1:10-CV-00165
JUDGE RON CLARK
MAGISTRATE KEITH F. GIBLIN
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al.’
Defendants.
___________________________________________/
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
1) The United States Constitution, in Article III, section 2, gives Federal District Courts jurisdiction to hear cases involving constitutional rights and federal law. This is called Federal Question Jurisdiction.
This Plaintiff’s complaint clearly pertains to issues involving constitutional rights and federal laws, and is not just simply one individual’s dislike of government policy.
2) Standing is simply the plaintiff’s ability to show the court that the law in question is connected to a harm that the plaintiff is or will receive. The law will clearly affect the plaintiff because the plaintiff is forced to pay for a private health service or pay a penalty to the government.
The plaintiff did not present more information about himself in the original complaint, other than he is an American Citizen, because that is all the information needed because this law applies to ALL American citizens.
The Defendants, in their motion the dismiss, admit that all American citizens must maintain a minimum level of health insurance coverage or face a penalty starting in 2014, unless the individual is exempt. Here is the information about the plaintiff that the court needs: The plaintiff is a 26 year old working male and does not get free health insurance coverage and is not exempt from having coverage. Therefore the plaintiff must pay for health insurance coverage, a private health service, or the government will penalize the plaintiff, therefore directly damaging the plaintiff through an unconstitutional extension of power that amounts to a direct tax. The penalty not going into effect until 2014 has no effect on the fact that, as the law stands, the plaintiff must pay for private healthcare coverage or face a government penalty. The plaintiff does not need to wait until he is hurt to file a lawsuit when the plaintiff can clearly show that he WILL be hurt. This lawsuit is to prevent the plaintiff from being hurt by a clearly foreseeable damage.
The damages do not only pertain to a monetary penalty. The damages also pertain to a direct infringement of plaintiff’s constitutional rights. Even if the defendants offered free health insurance coverage for the plaintiff, the fact is that the plaintiff has no option to not have any health care coverage at all. Nowhere does the constitution allow the government to force all individuals to have health insurance. The defendants might have a constitutional authority to regulate commerce and regulate health insurance, but the defendants do not have any constitutional authority to force all individuals to actually engage in said commerce. For instance, the government can regulate the auto industry, but the government cannot force everyone to buy or have a car (even if it was given to them for free). The defendants cite Baldwin v. Sebelius as a reason to dismiss the plaintiff’s case because in Baldwin v. Sebelius the court dismissed the case because the plaintiff could have changes in his job or age that would qualify him for minimum coverage by 2014. This does not apply to the plaintiff because the plaintiff in this case does not want minimum coverage by 2014 and instead the plaintiff believes it is his constitutional right to decide to have no private health coverage at all and the defendants forcing the plaintiff to have coverage extends beyond the defendants’ authority and infringes on the plaintiff’s constitutional rights.
The damages also extend to an infringement of plaintiff’s personal medical decisions and the privacy of their medical records. The defendants, in their motion to dismiss, state that some individuals will be exempt if they can show that they have a health insurance policy that would qualify as minimum coverage. This statement opens up an entirely different and more complex issue than what has already been addressed. First of all, how will the government know whether or not to penalize plaintiff for not having qualifying health insurance unless the government has complete access to plaintiff’s private health records, which would be an infringement of an individual’s fourth amendment rights. Second, what is considered qualifying health insurance? This seems to indicate that the government will approve all healthcare plans. That means that the plaintiff’s private treatment choices could be determined by what the government determines that all health insurances must offer, or not offer, in order to be qualified. This practice of the government determining what qualifying health insurance is will predetermines plaintiff’s potential treatment options. The defendants determining what is qualifying or not could also go against an individual’s First Amendment rights. If the government says that, in order to be qualified, all health insurance policies must offer abortion, and the plaintiff does not believe in paying for abortions because it is against his religion, then that individual is being deprived of their right to practice their religious beliefs. These questions of how the defendants will access plaintiff’s personal health records, and how the defendants will determine what is qualifying insurance, present issues that are serious enough to be examined by the court.
Conclusion
The defendants’ Motion to Dismiss should not be granted.
Respectfully submitted and signed this 11th day of December, 2010
_______________________________
Plaintiff, Michael David Bellow Jr.
Friday, November 5, 2010
Help My Mom Fight Cancer
This is David Bellow
My mom's cancer has spread and we are trying to pay for her to start a new treatment.
We are doing a big Garage Sale fundraiser and if anyone has some good stuff they would like to donate to the Garage Sale then please contact me! mdbellow@gmail.com or 409 656 5128
For drop-off locations in your area, please contact Misty at: theLaengers@hotmail.com
Also people can dontate money to help fund the treatment.
you can actually donate fast and easy online here: http://paulabellow.chipin.com/
The cancer had already spread to several places over the past 7 years including her bones and both lungs but now it has spread to her brain. She needs to receive brain radiation and begin treatment at the Burzynski Clinic soon but doesn't have the funds to cover the initial up-front fees and deposits.
Also, to raise funds, we are hosting a Benefit Garage Sale & Silent Auction at 1st Baptist Church of Conroe TX on Saturday, November 13th. We are collecting items for the garage sale all across southeast Texas.
So please come and/or donate items for the garage sale and silent auction!
You can follow my mom's progress by joining the facebook group "Support Mother of 10 in Her Fight Against Cancer" or by becoming a free member at www.carepages.com/carepages/PaulaBellow
My family especially asks for your prayers during this difficult journey and thanks you ahead of time for your support!
My mom's cancer has spread and we are trying to pay for her to start a new treatment.
We are doing a big Garage Sale fundraiser and if anyone has some good stuff they would like to donate to the Garage Sale then please contact me! mdbellow@gmail.com or 409 656 5128
For drop-off locations in your area, please contact Misty at: theLaengers@hotmail.com
Also people can dontate money to help fund the treatment.
you can actually donate fast and easy online here: http://paulabellow.chipin.com/
The cancer had already spread to several places over the past 7 years including her bones and both lungs but now it has spread to her brain. She needs to receive brain radiation and begin treatment at the Burzynski Clinic soon but doesn't have the funds to cover the initial up-front fees and deposits.
Also, to raise funds, we are hosting a Benefit Garage Sale & Silent Auction at 1st Baptist Church of Conroe TX on Saturday, November 13th. We are collecting items for the garage sale all across southeast Texas.
So please come and/or donate items for the garage sale and silent auction!
You can follow my mom's progress by joining the facebook group "Support Mother of 10 in Her Fight Against Cancer" or by becoming a free member at www.carepages.com/carepages/PaulaBellow
My family especially asks for your prayers during this difficult journey and thanks you ahead of time for your support!
Texas Needs a New Speaker of the House to Represent the new Conservative Republican Majority
This is David Bellow, State Republican Executive Committeeman for SD 3
I believe we need a new speaker of the Texas House of Representatives. One who is more Conservative and more Republican than our current speaker Joe Straus. Below are the facts that I have read that have proved to me that Joe Straus is not the man to lead our Conservative Republican state.
Please read the info Below about Straus
There is also a letter calling for a more conservative leader for Texas signed by many important Texas Leaders. This letter can be read here http://www.empowertexans.com/issues/letter_on_leadership
If you are a County Chairman or a leader of an organization like a Tea Party or a Republican Women's group, and you agree with this letter, please ADD YOUR NAME TO THE LETTER. Myself and many other Republican Leader have added their names to the list and it would really help if you added your name to the list as well.
You can add your name by going to this website http://www.empowertexans.com/contact-us and filling out the info or calling the number
Sincerely,
David Bellow
409 656 5128
mdbellow@gmail.com
http://www.davidbellow.com/
JOE STRAUS:
Under Joe Straus as Speaker of the Texas House of Representatives , many popular conservative measures were killed in the last legislature, including Voter ID (which had a 90% support rate among Republicans) and a very popular pro-life bill (which had nearly 70% support). Both measures had already passed the Republican Senate and Governor Perry was waiting to sign them, but these (and many other conservative measures) were killed in the Hous e by the Republican Speaker and his liberal lieutenants.
Jow Straus is for higher property tax. I believe property tax is the worst tax of all because a person can never own their own land. They are always leasing it from the government. Straus actively opposes a property tax cap. click here
Speaker Joe Straus hosted a fundraiser on May 12, 2010 for liberal Democrat Patrick Rose, who has a strong conservative Republican opponent, Jason Isaac
Speaker Joe Straus hosted a fundraiser on June 2, 2010 for liberal Democrat Trey Martinez-Fischer in Austin, Texas
Speaker Joe Straus very recently appointed Mike Villareal, a liberal Democrat, and Aaron Pena, another liberal Democrat, to chair and oversee redistricting committees across the state
Speaker Joe Straus, as a first-term state representative, took $1000 from Planned Parenthood and voted for SB 419, which would have made it easier to perform late-term, third-trimester abortions. In the 2007 session, he received a 100 percent voting record from the radical pro-abortion group NARAL
Speaker Joe Straus, as a state representative, voted to enrich (by "potentially tens of millions of dollars" - Texas Observer) his own family's gambling business interests (decade-old stock in the Austin Jockey Club, ownership in 3 horse &/or dog racetracks) by voting to increase gaming and gambling (HB 2265) and voting for casino gambling (HB 10) in Texas (specifically, slot machines allowed in racetracks.
I believe we need a new speaker of the Texas House of Representatives. One who is more Conservative and more Republican than our current speaker Joe Straus. Below are the facts that I have read that have proved to me that Joe Straus is not the man to lead our Conservative Republican state.
Please read the info Below about Straus
There is also a letter calling for a more conservative leader for Texas signed by many important Texas Leaders. This letter can be read here http://www.empowertexans.com/issues/letter_on_leadership
If you are a County Chairman or a leader of an organization like a Tea Party or a Republican Women's group, and you agree with this letter, please ADD YOUR NAME TO THE LETTER. Myself and many other Republican Leader have added their names to the list and it would really help if you added your name to the list as well.
You can add your name by going to this website http://www.empowertexans.com/contact-us and filling out the info or calling the number
Sincerely,
David Bellow
409 656 5128
mdbellow@gmail.com
http://www.davidbellow.com/
JOE STRAUS:
Under Joe Straus as Speaker of the Texas House of Representatives , many popular conservative measures were killed in the last legislature, including Voter ID (which had a 90% support rate among Republicans) and a very popular pro-life bill (which had nearly 70% support). Both measures had already passed the Republican Senate and Governor Perry was waiting to sign them, but these (and many other conservative measures) were killed in the Hous e by the Republican Speaker and his liberal lieutenants.
Jow Straus is for higher property tax. I believe property tax is the worst tax of all because a person can never own their own land. They are always leasing it from the government. Straus actively opposes a property tax cap. click here
Speaker Joe Straus hosted a fundraiser on May 12, 2010 for liberal Democrat Patrick Rose, who has a strong conservative Republican opponent, Jason Isaac
Speaker Joe Straus hosted a fundraiser on June 2, 2010 for liberal Democrat Trey Martinez-Fischer in Austin, Texas
Speaker Joe Straus very recently appointed Mike Villareal, a liberal Democrat, and Aaron Pena, another liberal Democrat, to chair and oversee redistricting committees across the state
Speaker Joe Straus, as a first-term state representative, took $1000 from Planned Parenthood and voted for SB 419, which would have made it easier to perform late-term, third-trimester abortions. In the 2007 session, he received a 100 percent voting record from the radical pro-abortion group NARAL
Speaker Joe Straus, as a state representative, voted to enrich (by "potentially tens of millions of dollars" - Texas Observer) his own family's gambling business interests (decade-old stock in the Austin Jockey Club, ownership in 3 horse &/or dog racetracks) by voting to increase gaming and gambling (HB 2265) and voting for casino gambling (HB 10) in Texas (specifically, slot machines allowed in racetracks.
Saturday, October 30, 2010
The Greg Abbott - Take back Texas Conservative rally was a HUGE success!
The Greg Abbott - Take back Texas Conservative rally was a HUGE success!
This will be an ANNUAL RALLY from now on!
We had SOOO many Republican candidates and elected officials like all the area’s local Republican candidates to State Board of Education to State Senate and State Reps to Appeals Judges and Attorney General Greg Abbott!
Never have we had an event in southeast Texas with all the area Republican candidates and officials. This was an amazing opportunity to meet candidates from the entire area all in one place and it was an awesome get out the vote rally right before the election. So we decided that we will do this every year before the election.
It will only get bigger and better!
Below are a few pictures from the rally.
Contact David Bellow to be a part of this yearly area-wide Conservative Republican rally!
www.DavidBellow.com
We had SOOO many Republican candidates and elected officials like all the area’s local Republican candidates to State Board of Education to State Senate and State Reps to Appeals Judges and Attorney General Greg Abbott!
Never have we had an event in southeast Texas with all the area Republican candidates and officials. This was an amazing opportunity to meet candidates from the entire area all in one place and it was an awesome get out the vote rally right before the election. So we decided that we will do this every year before the election.
It will only get bigger and better!
Below are a few pictures from the rally.
Contact David Bellow to be a part of this yearly area-wide Conservative Republican rally!
www.DavidBellow.com
Saturday, October 23, 2010
Take Back Texas - Beaumont Rally w/ Conservative Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott!!
Conservatives * Republicans * Tea Party Members
Huge Take Back Texas Rally
w/ Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott
Justice Charles Kreger - 9th Court of Appeals
State Senator Tommy Williams
Justice Charles Kreger - 9th Court of Appeals
State Senator Tommy Williams
J. Shane Howard for Jefferson County Tax Assessor Collector
Nancy Beaulieu for Jefferson County JP Precinct 1 Place 2
David Reeves for Jefferson County JP Precinct 7
Tim Funchess for Jefferson County Treasurer
Jody Crump for Orange County Commissioner
Jim Fuerstenberg - Jefferson County Republican Chairman
David Bellow - State Republican Executive Committeeman - Senate District 3
& MC John L of John L Productions
& MC John L of John L Productions
This Saturday Oct, 30th, 2010 1:30PM-3:30PM
5545 Eastex Freeway Beaumont TX (in lot by Sertinos and Best Buy)
On Nov 2nd we are taking back America by storm! Let us all meet together and have one last Huge rally to usher in the new Conservative takeover of America so that we can restore our Constitutional rights! Come with signs and lawn chairs! We will have links on the grill and Great Conservative Speakers!
Overview Map of Rally Location – click here
for more info contact David Bellow @ 409 656 5128 or www.DavidBellow.com
The liberals have a big rally planned in Washington DC on this exact date. I say we counteract the news coverage of their big liberal rally by coming out and having a huge crowd at this conservative Texas Back Texas rally!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)