Friday, March 30, 2012

TX Professor Reprimanded for Refusing to Watch Vulgar Gay Play at Lamar University in Beaumont

Wow, this happened right here in southeast Texas.

A theater arts department professor, Linda Ozmun, at Lamar University in Beaumont, TX had no problem doing her job. She was teaching kids about theater arts. That was her job and she was doing it just fine. The school wanted more than that though. According to a lawsuit that the terminated professor filed, the school chairwoman Judith Sebesta, and eventually the Dean, told her that she had to attend a vulgar gay pride play, by Tim Miller, or else she would be terminated. The professor is a Christian who did not want to go to a vulgar gay pride play. It was not part of her job and she would not be working at the gay play. The school just wanted her to personally go see the play. This gay play had been planned once before at the college but it was cancelled after the community complained that it would be too offensive and vulgar. The play was brought back though and the professor requested a reasonable accommodation to be excused from attending this offensive production. The dean of her college refused this simple accommodation and threatened plaintiff with disciplinary action if she failed to attend the performance. Because of her religious beliefs, plaintiff failed to attend the performance and as a result she was disciplined for her religious beliefs. Lamar University has discriminated against this professor on the basis of her religious beliefs in violation of the Texas anti-discrimination laws.

As Americans, we should tolerate other lifestyles. If someone wants to be gay then that is up to them and we cannot force them not to be gay. on the other hand, Americans should never be forced to accept an alternate lifestyle as normal or be forced to go to a gay play in violation of that person's Christian beliefs. That is the homosexual agenda though. They claim they just want to be tolerated but in reality, they will not be happy until they have forced Americans to accept their lifestyle as normal and right. They will not be happy until they force Christian organizations to provide health coverage that includes sex changes. They will not be happy until they have indoctrinated out children that they are bad if they do not agree with homosexuality, like this Fort Worth, TX kids who got suspended for simply BELIEVING that homosexuality is wrong. They will not be happy until they have forced states to recognize their relationships as a marriage even though the people have voted that marriage is only between a man and a woman.

from Courthouse News Service:
Gay Dances Were Too Much, Professor Says
BEAUMONT, Texas (CN) - A former tenure-track theater and dance professor claims in court that Lamar University administrators unfairly reprimanded her for refusing, for religious reasons, not to attend a gay

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Texas Republican Presidential Debate May 24th, 2012 in Houston – Nationally Televised!

Texas GOP will warn candidates that if they do not show up, they will be considered as not caring for Texas and should not get our vote
A Major Presidential Debate in Texas? This is pretty much unheard of!
Nothing is set in stone yet, but the Republican Party of Texas is close to finalizing a deal that will bring a nationally televised Republican Presidential Debate to Houston, TX on May 24th, 2012. The debate will be only 5 days before the Texas Primary Election and there are 155 Presidential Delegates at stake. A candidate needs 1144 delegates to win the Republican nomination.
Texas GOP Chairman Steve Munisteri has been working hard behind the scenes to get this debate together. He has received a commitment from a major television network to televise the debate if there is enough candidate participation. So far, two of the four Republican candidates have responded and agreed to the debate.
Texas needs more than 2 candidates to commit to the debate in order to pull the debate off. This Saturday, March 31st, 2012, the State Republican Executive Committee (SREC) will present, and likely pass, a resolution calling on all four candidates to show they have concern for our state by committing to be at the debate, and under no uncertain terms to make it known that the state party leadership would consider it a major slight to the state party and to Texas Republicans for them not to show up. 
This resolution should put enough heat on the candidates to get all 4 of them to show up.
The Republican Presidential Nomination Race is being split 4 ways (Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney, Ron Paul) with no signs of anyone backing out. This means that there will likely not be a winner yet by the time Texas gets a chance to vote in the May 29th, 2012 Texas Primary Elections.
This sets up Texas to be something it has not been in a while, a Battleground State.
Texas Should Go Back to Winner Take All
Texas has gone from winner take all to proportional because the RNC forced us to make the change because we were originally going to have our Primary Election before April. This means that Texas will have less of an impact in the Presidential Race because the 155 delegates that Texas has will be split up between 4 candidates instead of the 155 delegates all going to the candidate who wins Texas. This is not good for Texas because it significantly lowers the impact that Texas will have in the Presidential race. I have advocated for Texas to go back to winner take all to reclaim our state sovereignty and give Texas a bigger say in the Presidential Race. Proportional dilutes the voice of Texas because our delegates are all split up, whereas other states get to put all their delegates behind the one candidate who wins their state. This puts Texas at a disadvantage. With winner take all, Texas could significantly change the Presidential Race because the

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Texas Senator Hutchinson Defends Planned Parenthood and Criticizes Perry & Texas (video)

I always knew that Texas U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson was not as conservative as people thought and that she even supported abortion!. Now it is becoming more clear....

Kay Bailey Hutchinson Defends Planned Parenthood and Criticizes Rick Perry and Texas for not giving Planned Parenthood Taxpayer Money

Click Here to See Video of Hutchinson Defending Planned Parenthood

Obamacare Supreme Court Update: Swing Vote Justice Kennedy Harshly Questions Obamacare – Strike Down Likely?

The second day of the Obamacare trial at the U.S. Supreme Court has wrapped up.

The first day was not filled with much of the meat and potatoes that everyone has waited to see. Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott posted this video update about the first day of the trial.

This second day of the Obamacare trial is EXACTLY what people have been waiting for. This second day focused on the Constitutionality and Consequences of the individual mandate.

Justice Kennedy is believed to be the swing vote. If he goes against Obamacare then the Healthcare Law gets struck down. If he is for it then Obamacare is upheld.

Justice Kennedy had some of the harshest questions about Obamacare in the trial today. This leads me to believe that he is really questioning the constitutionality of Obamacare and the effects it might have if the government were allowed to have this much power.

Hopefully this is an indication that Kennedy will strike down Obamacare!

The most striking questions that Justice Kennedy asked today were:

“How can the government create a market for the purpose of enabling it to regulate that market?”

“Isn’t it true that this law, if undisturbed, would profoundly change the relationship of the federal government and individual Americans?”

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott later today will likely put out a more in-depth summary of day 2 of the Obamacare Trial in the Supreme Court.

For now, it is great following Greg Abbott's tweets from the Supreme Court. 

Below are a couple of Abbot's tweets from today:

@GregAbbott_TX - at #Obamacare argument Kennedy aggressively questioned DOJ. Concerned about gov't forcing people to buy things. #txlege

@GregAbbott_TX - Kennedy worried that if #Obamacare upheld there may be no limits on the commerce clause. #txlege

Monday, March 26, 2012

New Obama Executive Order Seizes U.S. Infrastructure and Citizens for Military Preparedness

March 18, 2012

In a stunning move, on March 16, 2012, Barack Obama signed an Executive Order stating that the President and his specifically designated Secretaries now have the authority to commandeer all domestic U.S. resources including food and water. The EO also states that the President and his Secretaries have the authority to seize all transportation, energy, and infrastructure inside the United States as well as forcibly induct/draft American citizens into the military. The EO also contains a vague reference in regards to harnessing American citizens to fulfill “labor requirements” for the purposes of national defense.

Not only that, but the authority claimed inside the EO does not only apply to National Emergencies and times of war. It also applies in peacetime.

The National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order exploits the “authority” granted to the President in the Defense Production Act of 1950 in order to assert that virtually every means of human survival is now available for confiscation and control by the President via his and his Secretaries’ whim.
The unconstitutionality of the overwhelming majority of Executive Orders is well established, as well as the illegality of denying citizens their basic Constitutional and human rights, even in the event of a legitimate national emergency. Likewise, it should also be pointed out that, like Obama’s recentLibyan adventure and the foregone conclusion of a Syrian intervention, there is no mention of Congress beyond a minor role of keeping the allegedly co-equal branch of government informed on contextually meaningless developments.

Full article at Activist Post

Sunday, March 25, 2012

Black Jasper, TX City Council Pays White Police Officers in Racial Discrimination Lawsuit Settlement

I previously wrote an article about how the City Council of Jasper, TX (the majority of the council members are black) turned down several white candidates in order to hire a lesser qualified black candidate (with a criminal record) for Police Chief, Rodney Pearson. Several lawsuits were filed alleging racial discrimination. Jasper TX City Council Hires Black Police Chief based on Race, not Qualifications - White Officers Get Demoted - new Chief has Criminal Record - Several Lawsuits Filed

Of course there were those who cried racism and said that the black city council members were being attacked because of their race when in fact they were being attacked for hiring an unqualified police chief with a criminal record.

Just this week there was a major update. The city seems to think that they might not win in court as the City of Jasper settled two of these lawsuits and dished out $60,000.

There are still several lawsuits pending and this small town in East Texas is going to have to dish out much more money before this is over. All of this is caused to the council not hiring the qualified candidate and instead basing the hire on race.

It is not know how much the insurance will pay out before it hits a cap, and it is not known how much the city's premium will go up.

Is Obama White? False Race Card in Black Trayvon Shooting will Hurt Obama, Democrats, and Push Away Hispanics

Democrats and Minority Groups are falsely and hypocritically playing the race card in Florida case of Hispanic George Zimmerman shooting and killing of Black Trayvon Martin. This will come back to hurt Democrats, Minority Groups, like the NAACP, and even Obama

-Some groups are seemingly breaking the law by soliciting the murder of Zimmerman. The New Black Panther Party has offered a $10,000 reward for the capture of Zimmerman Dead or Alive. You won't find Eric Holder and the DOJ charging them with anything though.  

-If the liberal media wants to say that Zimmerman is white then they must also declare that Obama is white and is not the first black President because Obama is half white too!

-New police reports say that Trayvon was suspended for having weed and Trayvon violently attacked Zimmerman

-Even former NAACP leader C.L. Bryant has accused Sharpton and Jackson of exploiting Trayvon Martin to racially divide the country.

Instead of bringing races together in American, the Democrats and minority groups like the NAACP are driving even more wedges between racial groups in America by alienating Hispanics with cries of racism. Instead of focusing on the actions of this one man, they are making this case a nationwide race card platform and also a platform advocating for more gun control.

Let me make one thing clear. My article is about racial hypocrisy surrounding this shooting and how it will backfire on Obama and the Democrats as they alienate Hispanics by playing the race card. My article is not written to take the side of Zimmerman or Martin. I personally think that things are probably a little more complicated than what the media makes things out to be though. No one really knows the facts yet and most people are just going off of emotion. People have every right to be upset and demand more answers about what happened and why an unarmed teen was shot and killed. No one is arguing against that. Heck, I want to know what happened too! I want the truth to come out and justice to be done too. I suspect that when emotions are taken out of the equation and the facts come out, it is not as open and shut a murder as people think. For instance, Martin was a 6'2" football player suspended from school for having weed, and not a little kid like the picture on the news portrays him as. Trayvon's recent tweets show his violent, sexist and Extremely Vulgar side. Also, police have released new facts and evidence corroborating what Zimmerman and witnesses have claimed, that Zimmerman was attacked, was the one crying for help, and was having his head pounded into the ground by Trayvon when Zimmerman shot in self defense. Again, I am not defending Zimmerman. I am just showing how the media has completely distorted this instead of letting everyone see the truth. I do not know what happened that night and I do not know whether or not Zimmerman started the fight and committed murder. I just know that this media storm is being driven by pure emotion and racism. I think the actual facts of the case are probably a little more complicated than people think. At the very least, Zimmerman should face a trial and be judged by a jury who can see the actual facts and decide whether or not Zimmerman broke any laws that night.

Not everyone wants just a trial and the truth though... some people are bringing race into this and using this tragic death as a pulpit to try to spew racial hatred and stir up racial tensions. 

Some groups are seemingly breaking the law by soliciting the murder of Zimmerman. The New Black Panther Party has offered a $10,000 reward for the capture of Zimmerman Dead or Alive. You won't find Eric Holder and the DOJ charging them with anything though.

Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, NAACP and New Black Panthers are all up in arms because they say Trayvon Martin getting shot and killed by George Zimmerman in Sanford, FL had to do with race.

This death had NOTHING to do with race. Zimmerman, whether right or wrong, has a history of calling the police and following ANYONE of ANY race.

In the 911 call, Zimmerman did not display any racism. Zimmerman himself is a Spanish speaking Hispanic minority who has black friends/family members and has no history of racism. One of Zimmerman's black friends, Joe Oliver, has even gone on the news to defend Zimmerman against accusations that he is a racist. Oliver said that there were recent break-ins and Zimmerman was trying to stop another one from happening. He said Zimmerman did not want to kill anyone and cried for days after he shot Trayvon.

Turning this tragic death into a soapbox to divide the country along racial lines with cries of racism is going to backfire.

Even former NAACP leader C.L. Bryant has accused Sharpton and Jackson of exploiting Trayvon Martin to racially divide the country.

This Turmoil will Push Hispanics away from Democrats, Obama, and Minority Groups like the NAACP

Hispanics are generally conservative, but they have stuck with the Democrats because they have been tricked into believing that the Democrats, and minority groups like the NAACP, are on their side. Minorities like blacks and Hispanics stick together right? It was easy for Hispanics to stick with the Democrats and watch the Dems and NAACP play the race card as long as the race card is only being played against whites. Now the race card is being played against Hispanics in the national media and Hispanics are being portrayed as racists, things will change.

I would expect that Hispanics, who have already started to wake up and realize that the Republican Party is where they belong because of their conservative values, will be turned away from Democrats even more now that the tide has turned and the Democrats and the NAACP have played the Race Card against Hispanics. The Democrats and NAACP have made a potentially fatal move in an important election year. By attacking Hispanics using the false race card, they are turning their political "allies" into the enemy and are driving a wedge in between the minority groups. This will open the eyes of Hispanics. Hispanics will feel betrayed and attacked by being painted as racist against blacks. Hispanics will wake up to the realization that the Democrats and these other minority groups do not care about them and they will open up even more to the Republican Party. Hispanics will see that Republicans have the right values and stand on solid foundations, instead of shaky foundations based on promises and racism like the Democrats.

Some liberal media outlets, like PBS, have realized that attacking a Hispanic as being racist against blacks will hurt the Democrats and so some of these news outlets have actually been falsely stating that Zimmerman is white. Zimmerman is a Spanish speaking Hispanic and is NOT white. Sure, Zimmerman has some white in him, but so does Obama. Zimmerman is as white as Obama is White. If the liberal media wants to say that Zimmerman is white then they must also declare that Obama is white and is not the first black President because Obama is half white too! The general public is not stupid. The general public has seen pictures of Zimmerman and knows he is Hispanic and not White.

This Turmoil will Back fire against Obama and the DOJ

Sharpton and Jackson and the NAACP brought the Department of Justice into this situation. After all, Obama and Eric Holder will surely be able to do what the local police have not and press charges against racist Zimmerman right? Wrong. The DOJ cannot get involved in State investigations unless they are able to find beyond a reasonable doubt that racism was the motive in the shooting. That is the only way they can arrest and charge Zimmerman for a federal hate crime.

The DOJ will likely NOT be able to charge Zimmerman because there was no racial hatred involved. I am not saying a crime was not committed. I am saying that race was not involved. The DOJ might be watching but they will ultimately not file hate crime charges and will leave it up to the state to handle the case/trial.

This inaction by the DOJ means that Obama and the DOJ will have "failed" in the eyes of those in the black community who want nothing less that hate crime charges.

Not only will Obama eventually fail the black community in this situation by not being able to press charges, he has already made a mistake in this situation by personally commenting on an ongoing, state investigation. Obama's comment on this ongoing investigation was more than just a simple comment though. Obama's comment brought emotion and race into the situation by saying that Trayvon could look like his son if Obama had a son.

This Turmoil shows the racial hypocrisy of Al Sharpton, NAACP, and Jesse Jackson.

"Jesse Jackson says that blacks are under attack" in response to this teens killing.

He is right, blacks are under attack, but not by Zimmerman, Hispanics or Whites.

Blacks are under attack by abortion. Planned Parenthood was started in an effort to keep the black population down, and continues to target blacks. More blacks are killed by abortion that by anything else.

Blacks are also under attack by blacks.

According to the DOJ, blacks in America represent only about 12% of the overall population, and yet blacks commit over 52% of all murders in America, and the majority of blacks who get killed are killed by other black people. Specifically, in 2010, 2720 Black Americans were murdered, 2569 of them were killed by fellow Blacks. In 2010, 218 Blacks were murdered by white people.

If Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson really wanted to help the black community from getting attacked and killed then they need to turn their attention on addressing black on black violence.

Instead, they continue to show their racial hypocrisy by pulling the race card in a situation where race is not involved and trying to make it seem as though all other races hate and want to kill the black race.

Why do Sharpton and Jackson not care about the 9 month old baby who was gunned down in Detroit? Why no outrage and marches through Detroit to find the killer of this innocent baby? Oh yeah, because the killer is likely not a white person and so Jackson and Sharpton do not care about that dead child because they cannot pull the race card. How about the white, unarmed war veteran, James Whitehead, who was shot in cold blood by a black off duty police officer Robert Arnold in Orange, TX? Where is the national outrage of the racially charged attack where a 13 year old white boy was set on fire earlier this month in Kansas where the attackers said "You get what you deserve, white boy." Oh yeah, they don't care about that injustice because they cannot pull the race card. In fact, there are 15,000 to 20,000 murders of babies, children, adults, senior citizens each year. Why not care about any of those murders?

Racial hypocrisy over the years has made it painfully clear that Al Sharpton, NAACP, New Black Panthers, and Jesse Jackson do not care about Justice for all. They only care about Justice when they can get in the national spotlight and pull the race card against any race other than the black race.

Media is CLEARLY biased against Zimmerman..

The Mainstream Media clearly has clearly used old pictures to make Zimmerman look criminal and make Trayvon look like an innocent kid. They doctored pictures of Trayvon Martin!

These Pictures of Zimmerman is from SEVERAL years old but the Media is using it instead of the recent picture of Zimmerman looking upstanding. The media clearly wants Zimmerman to look criminal by using an old picture

Zimmerman picture from years ago that media is using makes him look bad:

Zimmerman RECENT picture that media is not using because it makes him look upstanding:

This picture of Trayvon is from several years ago and make him look like a little child. Why not use recent pictures? The media intentionally has tried to make Trayvon look like a child by using a picture of Trayvon from years ago instead of using recent pictures that show him grown up and instead of 6'2".

Trayvon picture from YEARS AGO that media is using to make Trayvon look like a kid:

Trayvon CURRENT picture that he uploaded to his twitter account:

The media has also been using a picture of Trayvon in a hoodie. The original picture of Trayvon in a hoodie has been extremely doctored to make Trayvon look younger and innocent. This CLEARLY shows how the media is biased against Zimmerman.

Trayvon Before Doctoring:

Trayvon after doctoring:

Friday, March 23, 2012

Santorum has Better Chance than Romney to Beat Obama, according to Polls

I know some people who said they are supporting Romney because they believe that Romney is the Republican who has the best chance to beat Obama. (that worked so well with McCain in 2008 right?)

Anyways, I vote for a candidate based on their beliefs and not on a prediction on who will win in the future. no one knows the future and things always change. Santorum is more conservative than Romney so I support Santurum.

But, since some people vote based on who they think will win, they might want to consider Rick Santorum.

People say that Santorum is not electable of less electable. They are wrong.

All the latest Polls show Rick Santorum polling better against Obama that Romney.

Not only does Santorum have a higher popularity rating and fares better than Romney against Obama in national polls, but Santorum is actually beating Obama in polls in the four Key Core States while Romney is losing to Obama in polls in these four Core States.

Transvaginal Ultrasound is Better than Transvaginal Ultrasuck: Doctor Makes Case Against Abortion When Trying to Make Case Against Ultrasounds

An Anonymous Doctor posted an article on John Scalzi's blog called Whatever: Still Running Against the Wind.

The title of the article was "Guest Post: A Doctor On Transvaginal Ultrasounds"

This anonymous doctor called for civil disobedience to protest doing ultrasounds before abortions as required by law in order to inform the woman that there is a baby inside of her so she knows what she is doing before deciding to have an abortion. This doctor was in an uproar about having to perform an ultrasound even though an ultrasound is needed to perform an abortion anyways. Also, when the woman does get an abortion something worse than transvaginal ultrasound happens anyways. Transvaginal ultrasuck happens during an abortion and a human baby is sucked out piece by piece. But hey, these ultrasounds are just the worst thing ever so we need to just refuse to do them and continue on with the abortions....

What this doctor did not realize was that he/she made a case AGAINST ABORTION when he/she was trying to make a case against ultrasounds.

Here is a quote for this article:


It is our responsibility, as always, to protect our patients from things that would harm them. Therefore, as physicians, it is our duty to refuse to perform a medical procedure that is not medically indicated. Any medical procedure. Whatever the pseudo-justification.

It’s time for a little old-fashioned civil disobedience.

Well Doctor, if it is your duty to refuse doing an ultrasound because it is not medically needed, then according to your own words, it is your duty as a doctor to refuse performing most abortions because most abortions are elective abortions and are in no way medically indicated or needed.

Gottcha on that one Doctor!

So doctor, when will you be writing an article calling for civil disobedience by refusing elective abortions in order to save a woman and an unborn baby from harm of a medically unnecessary and murderous abortion procedure?

Sunday, March 18, 2012

State of Texas Sues DOJ & Challenges Voting Rights Act Section 5 Constitutionality

I have stated in past articles that Texas needs to sue the DOJ because Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional.

My Dreams are finally coming true!

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, on behalf of the State of Texas, has Sued Eric Holder and the Department of Justice! Greg Abbott, in his legal motion, directly challenges the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act in response to the DOJ rejecting the Texas Voter ID Law.

With the Supreme Court already set to hear a challenge to the Voting Rights Act this year in a case out of Alabama, this challenge from Texas is more ammo needed to get the Supreme Court to declare parts of the Voting Rights act as unconstitutional.

Below are my thoughts on why Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional, and also there is a statement from Greg Abbott about his lawsuit against the DOJ:

Greg Abbott on Voting Rights Act Legal Challenge:

Austin, TX - Attorney General Abbott's Comments on the State of Texas' Amended Complaint in the Voter ID Case
"The U.S. Supreme Court has already upheld the constitutionality of laws requiring voters to show a photo ID when voting at the polls. The U.S. Department of Justice argued in favor of those laws just a few years ago. For the Department of Justice to now contend that Texas cannot implement its voter ID law denies Texas the ability to do what other states can rightfully exercise under the Constitution."

"The U.S. Supreme Court expressed serious misgivings about Section 5 in the Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District case. As recently as two months ago, Justice Kennedy stated from the bench that Section 5 places Texas at a disadvantage compared to other states. The Department of Justice is using Section 5 to deny Texas the right to enforce a law that is allowed under the U.S. Constitution. Section 5 cannot trump the Constitution."

My Thoughts on Why Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act is Unconstitutional

11)      Section 5 requires some states to have their plans approved by the DOJ while other states do not have to have anything approved. It is inequitable to have one standard for some states and a different standard from some states. That is like having one school for blacks and one school for whites. The different standards also creates a situation where you have some states, like Illinois, getting to

Obama and DOJ Holder Reject Texas Voter ID Law - Rick Perry and Greg Abbott Respond

the Department of Justice has denied preclearance the Voter ID law that was passed in the 2011 Legislative Session.

Below are the responses from Texas Governor Rick Perry and Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott.

Greg Abbott:

AUSTIN - Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott issued the following response regarding the DOJ denial of preclearance for Texas' Voter ID law:

"The Justice Department's decision to deny preclearance to Texas' Voter ID law is no surprise given the Obama Administration's denial of a similar law in South Carolina. In anticipation of this decision, the Texas Attorney General's office already filed legal action in January seeking judicial preclearance with the court system. The U.S. Supreme Court has already held that Voter ID requirements are constitutional and nondiscriminatory, and several other states--including Georgia, Indiana, Kansas and Wisconsin--are allowed to require photo

Saturday, March 17, 2012

Houston, TX Petition to end Sanctuary City Policy and Use E-Verify - 20,000 Signatures Needed

A couple of weeks ago I received an email about a petition drive in Houston, Texas. The petitions are aimed at ending the Sanctuary City policy in Houston and also require E-Verify to be used in Houston.

There petitions require 20,000 signatures each by about late summer 2012 in order to get on the ballot. If they make it onto the ballot and the people of Houston vote in favor of them, they will become a part of Houston's City Ordinances and Regulations, regardless of whether or not the City Council approves of them or not.

Houston has especially been hit hard by illegal immigrant crimes with recent murders of Houston Police Officers by illegals. These illegals who killed police officers would likely have been deported before they could kill if Houston Police Officers were allowed to check the citizenship status of people who they arrest. I have to show my ID when I get pulled over, I do not see why it would be discriminatory to check the citizen status of people who get arrested or pulled over for an infraction not related to their race or ethnicity.

Below is the information I received about this Petition Drive:

Stop the Magnet is a petition drive effort seeking 20,000 City of Houston registered voters to help deter the detrimental effects of illegal immigration in our community.
The “magnets” of jobs and operating under the radar in our city encourages criminal behavior and the ability to set down roots in our community.
We are offering two ballot proposals to help keep American citizens in the workforce and a proactive policy for our Houston Police officers to check the identities more fully where no valid identification is presented in a probable cause encounter.
We believe it is an outrage that our heroic fighting forces are called out to fight for freedom around the world while at home in the United States our borders remain wide open and the costs are borne by hard-working

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Gunman Kills at Least 2 in Jefferson County Courthouse Shooting in Beaumont, TX

My wife works in downtown Beaumont. She called me and told me what they locked down their building because a gunman was shooting and killing people at the Jefferson County Courthouse close to where she works.

This is what we know so far from local media outlets

Fatal courthouse shooting suspect was on trial for sexual assault of a child according to Beaumont Enterprise

Beaumont Enterprise reports than only one person is dead and not 2 as reported by the courthouse bailiffs

from KBMT 12 News:

the shooter is Bartholomew Granger who had a court hearing set for Wednesday afternoon.

from Fox 4 KBTV:

Four people have been shot, one fatally.  Two were family members of the suspect while 2 others were bystanders.

Three of the victims were shot in the parking lot.

One was found in the basement of the courthouse.

from KFDM:

BEAUMONT - A man has shot several people at the Jefferson County Courthouse, including one elderly woman dead at the scene outside the courthouse, and at least three other people who were shot and survived, including another person shot outside the courthouse, one in the basement of the County Clerk's Office, and one at the Bus transfer station, according to information provided to KFDM News by Beaumont EMS and Fire.

Police responded to the call of

My Wife and I Will Be Having a Baby! The Precious Gift of Life!

Someone special, Someone dear, Someone new to love will soon be here....

My wife and I will be having a baby!

yes those are our hands in the picture:-)

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Gay Texas Planned Parenthood CEO Arrested & Charged with Indecent Exposure in Lubbock, TX

 “Tony Thorton Planned Parenthood Association of Lubbock CEO, has been arrested and charged with indecent exposure. Thornton was arrested at the baseball field on Municipal Drive in Lubbock, said Sgt. Jonathan Stewart with the Lubbock Police Department. Thornton was released from Lubbock County Jail Tuesday morning just after 11 a.m., online records show.”

Tony Thorton is an open homosexual so it will be interesting to find out what the circumstances are surrounding him exposing himself….

Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas is currently facing a lawsuit that exposes millions of dollars that Planned Parenthood has defrauded the taxpayers of. President Obama is also threatening to terminate funding for women's health services in Texas in response to Texas refusing to fund Abortion Providers as part of this health program.

Monday, March 12, 2012

Wallbuilders: Obama is America's Most Biblically Hostile U.S. President

Below is one of the best, in-depth articles I have seen regarding President Obama's hostility toward the Bible and Religion (except for Islam of course). It is from

By David Barton of Wallbuilders

When one observes President Obama’s unwillingness to accommodate America’s four-century long religious conscience protection through his attempts to require Catholics to go against their own doctrines and beliefs, one is tempted to say that he is anti-Catholic. But that characterization would not be correct. Although he has recently singled out Catholics, he has equally targeted traditional Protestant beliefs over the past four years. So since he has attacked Catholics and Protestants, one is tempted to say that he is anti-Christian. But that, too, would be inaccurate. He has been equally disrespectful in his appalling treatment of religious Jews in general and Israel in particular. So perhaps the most accurate description of his antipathy toward Catholics, Protestants, religious Jews, and the Jewish nation would be to characterize him as anti-Biblical. And then when his hostility toward Biblical people of faith is contrasted with his preferential treatment of Muslims and Muslim nations, it further strengthens the accuracy of the anti-Biblical descriptor. In fact, there have been numerous clearly documented times when his pro-Islam positions have been the cause of his anti-Biblical actions.
Listed below in chronological order are (1) numerous records of his attacks on Biblical persons or organizations; (2) examples of the hostility toward Biblical faith that have become evident in the past three years in the Obama-led military; (3) a listing of his open attacks on Biblical values; and finally (4) a listing of numerous incidents of his preferential deference for Islam’s activities and positions, including letting his Islamic advisors guide and influence his hostility toward people of Biblical faith.
1. Acts of hostility toward people of Biblical faith:
  • April 2008 – Obama speaks disrespectfully of Christians, saying they “cling to guns or religion” and have an “antipathy to people who aren't like them.” 1
  • February 2009 – Obama announces plans to revoke conscience protection for health workers who refuse to participate in medical activities that go against their beliefs, and fully implements the plan in February 2011. 2
  • April 2009 – When speaking at Georgetown University, Obama orders that a monogram symbolizing Jesus' name be covered when he is making his speech. 3
  • May 2009 – Obama declines to host services for the National Prayer Day (a day established by federal law) at the White House. 4
  • April 2009 – In a deliberate act of disrespect, Obama nominated three pro-abortion ambassadors to the Vatican; of course, the pro-life Vatican rejected all three. 5
  • October 19, 2010 – Obama begins deliberately omitting the phrase about “the Creator” when quoting the Declaration of Independence – an omission he has made on no less than seven occasions. 6
  • November 2010 – Obama misquotes the National Motto, saying it is “E pluribus unum” rather than “In God We Trust” as established by federal law. 7
  • January 2011 – After a federal law was passed to transfer a WWI Memorial in the Mojave Desert to private ownership, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled that the cross in the memorial could continue to stand, but the Obama administration refused to allow the land to be transferred as required by law, and refused to allow the cross to be re-erected as ordered by the Court. 8
  • February 2011 – Although he filled posts in the State Department, for more than two years Obama did not fill the post of religious freedom ambassador, an official that works against religious persecution across the world; he filled it only after heavy pressure from the public and from Congress. 9
  • April 2011 – For the first time in American history, Obama urges passage of a non-discrimination law that does not contain hiring protections for religious groups, forcing religious organizations to hire according to federal mandates without regard to the dictates of their own faith, thus eliminating conscience protection in hiring. 10
  • August 2011 – The Obama administration releases its new health care rules that override religious conscience protections for medical workers in the areas of abortion and contraception. 11
  • November 2011 – Obama opposes inclusion of President Franklin Roosevelt’s famous D-Day Prayer in the WWII Memorial. 12
  • November 2011 – Unlike previous presidents, Obama studiously avoids any religious references in his Thanksgiving speech. 13
  • December 2011 – The Obama administration denigrates other countries' religious beliefs as an obstacle to radical homosexual rights. 14
  • January 2012 – The Obama administration argues that the First Amendment provides no protection for churches and synagogues in hiring their pastors and rabbis. 15
  • February 2012 – The Obama administration forgives student loans in exchange for public service, but announces it will no longer forgive student loans if the public service is related to religion. 16
2. Acts of hostility from the Obama-led military toward people of Biblical faith:
  • June 2011 – The Department of Veterans Affairs forbids references to God and Jesus during burial ceremonies at Houston National Cemetery. 17
  • August 2011 – The Air Force stops teaching the Just War theory to officers in California because the course is taught by chaplains and is based on a philosophy introduced by St. Augustine in the third century AD – a theory long taught by civilized nations across the world (except America). 18
  • September 2011 – Air Force Chief of Staff prohibits commanders from notifying airmen of programs and services available to them from chaplains. 19

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Obama Threatens TX Women's Health - SE Texas Planned Parenthood Million Dollar Fraud Exposed in Lawsuit

All the talk from President Obama and the Democrats about standing for the health of women is all FALSE. They do not care. When they say they want to protect the health of women, they really mean they just want to protect the abortion industry and keep killing innocent Americans.

President Obama is threatening to end funding for a Texas Women's Health program that helps 130,000 low income women. Wait a second, I though Obama was all about helping women? NOT! You see, Texas will no longer allow money from this program to go to Abortion Providers like Planned Parenthood. Women in this Texas Health Program still have all options for getting health services that planned parenthood provides, except that the tax money will not be going to pay for abortion providers. You know this was going to make Obama mad because Obama loves Planned Parenthood and will do anything to keep their doors open and the baby mills churning. He even turned his back on the troops in the big government shutdown last year. He was willing to withhold pay from the troops fighting for us because planned parenthood funding was getting cut. Paying to kill babies is more important that paying the troops right?

President Obama says that Texas not funding Planned Parenthood in this Health Program limits the choices that women who are in this heath program should have.

So what does Obama do to "help" these women who have had their choices limited by big bad Texas? He does the only logical thing and completely ends funding for the health program and tosses the 130,000 in this program out on the street. Yep, Obama does not like that Texas limited health choices so Obama further limits health choices by not funding the program and effectively kicking all these women out of the program.

So, who is for Women's Health again? Yep, Obama and the Democrats have been outed. The Republicans are the ones who really do care about the health of Women and the health of babies. Texas wants to help women with this health program and at the same time stop funding baby killers. Obama and the Democrats do not care about the health of women. Obama only cares about funding baby mills, and if the money for funding abortions is restricted then he turns his back on women by completely defunding the health program.

Court Unseals Lawsuit that shows Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas Defrauded MILLIONS from Medicaid and Texas Women's Health Program.

Texas has good reason to end funding to Planned Parenthood. Not only do they kill babies, they also are deeply involved in scams and are stealing millions of dollars from taxpayers.

According to an article written by Karla Dial, a federal judge today unsealed a lawsuit a former Planned Parenthood employee filed nearly three years ago. The suit claims that the abortion seller engages in a pernicious and persistent pattern of Medicaid fraud.

Abby Johnson, the former director of a Planned Parenthood clinic in the Bryan/College Station area, states in the lawsuit filed by the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) that Planned Parenthood knowingly sought improper reimbursements from the Texas Women’s Health Program from 2007 to 2009.

According to court documents, Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas filed at least 87,075 fraudulent claims. As a result, according to Johnson, Planned Parenthood allegedly received more than $5.7 million from Medicaid for services the program doesn’t cover or which were never performed in the first place.

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Will Murders & people who don't buy Healthcare end up in Prison together? Funny Picture

Is this what Obamacare will end up looking like?

Texas DPS Warns Against Travel to Mexico: 120 Americans Killed in 2011 & Drug Cartel Violence Soars

From Dan Flynn
District 2 State Representative
March 6, 2012
Contact: David Erinakes

DPS Advises Against Spring Break Travel to Mexico

The Texas Department of Public Safety is again urging Spring Breakers to avoid traveling to Mexico as a result of continued violence throughout the country.
"The Mexican government has made great strides battling the cartels, and we commend their continued commitment to making Mexico a safer place to live and visit," said DPS Director Steven C. McCraw. "However, drug cartel violence and other criminal activity represent a significant safety threat, even in some resort areas."
According to published information from the U.S. Department of State: *
  • 12,903 narcotics-related homicides were reported the first nine months of 2011 alone.
  • The number of U.S. citizens reported as murdered in Mexico increased from 35 in 2007 to 120 in 2011.
  • U.S. citizens have fallen victim to transnational criminal activity, including homicide, gun battles, kidnapping, carjacking and highway robbery.
  • Rape and sexual assault continue to be serious problems in resort areas.
  • Some bars and nightclubs, especially in resort cities such as Cancun, Acapulco, Mazatlan, Cabo San Lucas, and Tijuana can be havens for drug dealers and petty criminals.
  • Crime and violence are serious problems throughout the country and can occur anywhere.
  • The State Department now urges U.S. travelers to defer non-essential travel to all or parts of 14 Mexican states, four more than 2011.